I just saw this news about a 10 year old Florida school girl taking a steak knife to school to eat her steak that she took in her lunch to school. All parties are agreed that the girl did not mishandle the steak knife in any way or threaten any one in any way, but this doesn't mean the girl isn't in big trouble. See this link for the exact details:
http://www.wftv.com/news/14858405/detail.html
According to the link, the teachers said they had no choice, policy forced them to call the police. The police said they had no choice, they had to take the girl to a juvenile detention center for observation once they were called. The school has suspended the girl from school for 10 days. The girl may face felony charges.
I'm not going to hyperventilate and get too far down the line. "Could face felony charges" doesn't mean this will happen. I hope reason and measure come into play in this circumstance. And I hope the girl is back in school tomorrow.
My question to you all is . . . how does this happen? How is it that so many rational adults can say they have no choice, they know better, but they have no choice but to do something irrational? I think it is probably due to lawyers. Lawyers tell the school that if they do not have a uniform weapons policy, they are subject to law suits; the policy must be rigorous and unambiguous; and it must define "weapons" broadly enough to get anything that could be used as a weapon, including a steak knife (I'm imagining one of those bendable, serrated edge knives). Why is the school subject to law suits if it doesn't have a policy but uses judgment and discrimination instead of some lame-brained rigorous, inflexible policy? Because other lawyers will sue the school opportunistically to get money if they don't. What did Shakespeare write would be the firstthing to dowhen rising to power in the play Richard III?
So are we in danger of being slaves to irrational and inflexible policies that are driven by the fear of law suits?
On a similar theme, but only tangentially related, in how many walks of life -- for example professional life -- are matters of judgment, discernment, and experience being turned into formulaic rules of conduct, as if a high level manager doesn't entrust his subordinates to act, rules which -- like the case of the ten year old girl with a steak knife eating her lunch, no threat to anyone -- in fact screw things up in their very inflexibility and complel rational adults to "have no choice" but to act irrationally?
Feel free to amend and extend my remarks. There is no real point of focus of this thread. Find some related topic and just tee-off on it, man! It is Monday.