I agree with him on two things one being Rosie and the other being Bush.
Quote:
WASHINGTON (CNN) "” Donald Trump has some advice for President Bush if he wants a Republican to win the White House: Hide.
The business mogul and vocal critic of the Bush administration told CNN's Wolf Blitzer Monday that he thinks the president is a "huge liability" for any Republican seeking the White House. Trump went on to say the best thing Bush can do for his party is to go into "hiding."
"I think President Bush has to go into a corner and hide if a Republican is going to get elected," he said. "There is no way he is an asset. He is a huge liability, and he is going to have to do a big, big hiding act if a Republican is going to win."
Once a Republican nominee is determined, Trump added, Bush "should just go into a corner and say 'Okay, that's it. I am finished. It's over.'"
Trump also reiterated his comments[/b] to CNN in March that Bush is "probably" the worst president in American history, saying, "We've gone from this tremendous power that was respected all over the world to somewhat of a laughing stock."
"And, all of the sudden, people are talking about China and India and other places"¦. Even from an economic standpoint, America's come down a long way," he added. "It's very, very sad."
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,185
RE: I'm not a fan but.......
True, Bush is going to be a liabililty to the Republicans, but the Democrates are just as big of a liability to there party just by being who they are. I cant find a one that I feel comfortable voteing for, demos or rep.
__________________
kaafir mushrik
Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.
I haven't figured out why anything Donald Trump has to say would be considered headline-worthy. What qualifications does he have as a political analyst?
As for Bush "hiding," he's still the president until January 2009. I expect to continue to see him performing the duties of the office until January 2009.
I would like to see Trump's reasoning for his statement about America coming down "a long long way" from an economic standpoint.
On second thought, I don't really care what his reasoning is.
__________________
We must be the change we wish to see in the world -- Ghandi
http://www.rightminded.net
I agree with him on two things one being Rosie and the other being Bush.
Quote:
"We've gone from this tremendous power that was respected all over the world to somewhat of a laughing stock."
"And, all of the sudden, people are talking about China and India and other places"¦. Even from an economic standpoint, America's come down a long way," he added. "It's very, very sad."
Hahaha... Yep. That Trump, he's a genius. Modernizing economies in nations withcombined 2.5Billion+ people, are having a global impact as big as or more than an economy with 280 million people... Who could have imagined such a thing? Very, very sad....
I agree with him on two things one being Rosie and the other being Bush.
Quote:
"We've gone from this tremendous power that was respected all over the world to somewhat of a laughing stock."
"And, all of the sudden, people are talking about China and India and other places"¦. Even from an economic standpoint, America's come down a long way," he added. "It's very, very sad."
Hahaha... Yep. That Trump, he's a genius. Modernizing economies in nations withcombined 2.5Billion+ people, are having a global impact as big as or more than an economy with 280 million people... Who could have imagined such a thing? Very, very sad....
Its just a shame that he was not elected to run these third world countrys economies instead of destroying ours.
A few points , the value of the dollar, economic growth @ 3.5 %, fuel cost, the boarder & those very impressive trade deficit numbers.
The man sure is a shining star.
Its just a shame that he was not elected to run these third world countrys economies instead of destroying ours.
A few points , the value of the dollar, economic growth @ 3.5 %, fuel cost, the boarder & those very impressive trade deficit numbers.
The man sure is a shining star.
Anyone who thinks we'd have been better off with Kerry is two slices short of a loaf. And anyone who thinks we'll be better of with Hillary or Obama - - - well... I'm not sure there's even any bread at all...
Its just a shame that he was not elected to run these third world countrys economies instead of destroying ours.
A few points , the value of the dollar, economic growth @ 3.5 %, fuel cost, the boarder & those very impressive trade deficit numbers.
The man sure is a shining star.
Anyone who thinks we'd have been better off with Kerry is two slices short of a loaf. And anyone who thinks we'll be better of with Hillary or Obama - - - well... I'm not sure there's even any bread at all...
If your point is the democrats are dumber yet I will agree. I just think this country deserves to be run by some one that has the ability to dissect a problem, search for a solution and get the ball moving in such a manor to solve said problem in a reasonable amount of time and the betterment of America being of the ult most importance.
I believe in America first! I don't believe our sitting president does.
His lack of ability to clearly assess a problem prevents him from solving even the most basic of problems.
Its just a shame that he was not elected to run these third world countrys economies instead of destroying ours.
A few points , the value of the dollar, economic growth @ 3.5 %, fuel cost, the boarder & those very impressive trade deficit numbers.
The man sure is a shining star.
Anyone who thinks we'd have been better off with Kerry is two slices short of a loaf. And anyone who thinks we'll be better of with Hillary or Obama - - - well... I'm not sure there's even any bread at all...
If your point is the democrats are dumber yet I will agree. I just think this country deserves to be run by some one that has the ability to dissect a problem, search for a solution and get the ball moving in such a manor to solve said problem in a reasonable amount of time and the betterment of America being of the ult most importance.
I believe in America first! I don't believe our sitting president does.
His lack of ability to clearly assess a problem prevents him from solving even the most basic of problems.
Their platform is almost exclusively to related to the generation of class envy/class warfare and race envy/race warfare, taxation to the point of disincentive, and redistribution of wealth from contributing members of society to non-contributing members of society.
Its just a shame that he was not elected to run these third world countrys economies instead of destroying ours.
A few points , the value of the dollar, economic growth @ 3.5 %, fuel cost, the boarder & those very impressive trade deficit numbers.
The man sure is a shining star.
Anyone who thinks we'd have been better off with Kerry is two slices short of a loaf.Â* And anyone who thinks we'll be better of with Hillary or Obama - - - well... I'm not sure there's even any bread at all...
If your point is the democrats are dumber yet I will agree. I just think this country deserves to be run by some one that has the ability to dissect a problem, search for a solution and get the ball moving in such a manor to solve said problem in a reasonable amount of time and the betterment of America being of the ult most importance.
I believe in America first!Â* I don't believe our sitting president does.
His lack of ability to clearly assess a problem prevents him from solving even the most basic of problems.
Their platform is almost exclusively to related to the generation of class envy/class warfare and race envy/race warfare, taxation to the point of disincentive, and redistribution of wealth from contributing members of society to non-contributing members of society.Â*
Socialism, in other words?
__________________
Kevin Haendiges
NAHC Life Member
NRA Member
Wildlife Forever Member
GOA Member
Buckmasters Member
http://hunting-indiana.com
I'm not a fan but.......
