logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-21-2007, 05:58 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 217
Default BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

. Anti-gun terror bill (S. 735 )
On June 7, 1995, the Senate passed an anti-gun terror bill (S. 735) by a vote of 91-8. This version of the terror bill included: a BATF pay increase of $100 million; a provision authorizing "roving wiretaps" allowing government officials to wiretap one"s home if a person under investigation visits the home " even if one had no knowledge the person was a suspect; a weakening of the Posse Commitatus law to give the military more authority to get involved in law enforcement in certain circumstances; a grant of power to the FBI to conduct "fishing expeditions" and secure one"s financial and travel records in certain circumstances without any evidence one has committed a crime; and finally, the "Randy Weaver entrapment provision" which extends the statute of limitations for violations under the National Firearms Act of 1934 from three to five years. Thompson voted in favor of the bill.
2. Anti-gun terror bill " final passage
On April 17, 1996, the Senate passed the conference version of the anti-terrorism bill by a vote of 91-8. The final version of the bill (S. 735) contained several problems, including ones that will: order an "anti-hunter" rifle and ammo study; authorize a $40 million pay increase for the BATF (through the Treasury Department); potentially punish gun dealers (and individuals) for selling ammunition to someone they should have known would commit a violent crime; federalize many state crimes, thus tremendously increasing the scope and jurisdiction of the BATF; restrict the right of habeas corpus in such a way as to severely damage the ability of the courts to rescue honest gun owners who are unjustly incarcerated; allow the government to use "secret evidence" against certain individuals; remove protections against wiretapping wireless data; and require banks to freeze the assets of domestic groups in certain situations. Thompson once again voted in favor of the bill.
3. Taggants in gunpowder
On September 12, 1996, the Senate voted (57-42) to keep an anti-gun amendment off of the Treasury-Postal appropriations bill (H.R. 3756). The Kerry amendment " which Thompson voted for" would have made funds available for a study of tagging explosive materials, including black and smokeless powders (thus setting the stage for registering ammunition). The amendment also sought to further demonize firearms by selectively examining the misuse of firearms by criminals. The study would not examine the number of times firearms are used to save the lives of decent citizens.
4. Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation gun ban
On September 12, 1996, the Senate passed the Lautenberg gun ban as an amendment to the Treasury-Postal appropriations bill (H.R. 3756). The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation Gun Ban disarms gun owners for small (misdemeanor) offenses in the home " "offenses" as slight as spanking a child or grabbing a spouse. This lifetime ban, in certain cases, can even be imposed without a trial by jury. It is also retroactive, so it does not matter if the offense occurred 20 years ago. Thompson voted in favor of the amendment.
5. Free Speech restrictions
On October 7, 1997, the Senate defeated an "Incumbent Protection Bill" (S. 25) which would have resulted in the government regulation of GOA"s newsletters and other communications with its members, while expanding the relative political power of the liberal media and other anti-gun forces. Senators failed in their effort, 53 to 47, to shut down a filibuster of the bill that was ostensibly aimed at reforming campaign finance laws.
6. Smith "Anti-Brady" Amendment
On July 21, 1998, pro-gun Senator Bob Smith (R-NH) introduced an "Anti-Brady" amendment that passed by a vote of 69-31. The Smith amendment would prohibit the FBI from using Brady background checks to tax or register gun owners. Further, the amendment requires the "immediate destruction of all [gun buyer] information, in any form whatsoever." Finally, if the FBI disregards this latter provision, the Smith language will allow private citizens to sue the agency and collect monetary damages, including attorney"s fees. Thompson, in keeping with his tendency to usually vote for expanded federal police power, voted against this limitation of FBI registration of gun owners.
7. Anti-gun Clinton judge appointment
On February 11, 1998, the Senate voted 67-28 to confirm Margaret Morrow to the Federal bench. GOA vigorously opposed this Clinton-appointed judge, as she has not only taken strident anti-gun positions, she has showed herself to be a gun control activist.
8. Anti-gun Surgeon General
Having nominated anti-gun David Satcher for Surgeon General, President Bill Clinton was forced to wait several months as debate raged over his controversial pick. But on February 10, 1998, the President finally realized victory. By a vote of 75-23, anti-gun Republicans teamed up with the Democrats to kill the filibuster over the Satcher nomination. Mr. Satcher was later confirmed by a vote of 63-35. Since the key vote was to end the filibuster, that is the one that was rated by GOA.
9. Ending the filibuster of a major anti-gun crime bill
On July 28, 1999, the Senate ended a filibuster led by Senator Bob Smith (I-NH) " a filibuster intended to keep anti-gun crime legislation from progressing any further. After the 77-22 vote, the Senate moved to send the language of the anti-gun Senate crime bill (S. 254) to a House-Senate conference committee. Thompson voted to break the pro-gun filibuster.
10. Young adult gun ban
The young adult gun ban could severely punish parents who allow their kids to even touch a so-called semi-automatic "assault weapon." While the amendment allows for certain exemptions, there are some imponderable questions which NO senator could answer, but which a parent would have to answer in order to avoid incarceration. For example: What is a "semiautomatic assault weapon"? The definition, plus exemptions, takes up six pages of fine print in the U.S. Code. Second, a child can handle a banned semi-auto if he is in the "immediate and supervisory presence" of a parent or if he possess a written permission slip from the parent. But what happens when, during a target practice session, the parent walks to the car to retrieve his lunch and the juvenile is no longer in the parents "immediate" presence and does not have a permission slip? A parent can receive jail time for this infraction. The provision passed the Senate on May 13, 1999, with Thompson voting in the majority.
11. Adopting the "Gun Control Lite" strategy
On May 13, 1999, a majority of Senators " including Thompson " defeated a motion to table (or kill) an anti-gun amendment introduced by Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Larry Craig (R-WY). This amendment was offered as an alternative to gun control proposals being pushed by Sen. Frank Lautenberg.
12. McCain"s Incumbent Protection (2000 version)
By 59 to 41, the Senate passed S. 27, to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to include Incumbent Protection provisions. The bill severely curtails the ability of outside groups such as GOA to communicate the actions of incumbent politicians to members and supporters prior to an election.
13. Incumbent Protection (2002 failed filibuster)
This was the key vote in the Senate regarding the odious Incumbent Protection bill in 2002 (H.R. 2356). The legislation finally became law that year. As he had on previous occasions, Thompson voted in favor of the bill.


Straight from Fox news.


Fred Thompson Aided Nixon on Watergate
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288538,00.html



It now appears that lobbyist Fred Thompson, who was minority counsel on the Watergate investigations committee, repeatedly gave Nixon's team an unauthorized heads-up.
Lobbyist Fred Thompson admits to his role as a mole for Nixon in his Watergate memoir, At That Point in Time (which, by the way, is pretty expensive these days):


http://politicsplus.blogspot.com/2007/07/fred-thompson-watergate-mole.html
conner_condor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 06:40 PM   #2
Boone & Crockett
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in the west coast of New England
Posts: 13,132
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

Perhaps that explains why he has been hesitant to enter the race. His skeletons are sitting right there waiting to make an appearance. If true...and I do not doubt your research CCit will eliminate him from my consideration.MY reason....... is he is presently inferring that he is pro gun. We don't need another lying POTUS. We have had too many in a row. I will wait to reserve judgment until after he enters the race"if he does.
__________________
Too busy with fishing to spend much time here.
Champlain Islander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 06:42 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,602
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

Another case in point.

Next is John McCain. Then you'll have about 5 other GOP candidates to go after if your aim is a thread for each candidate currently ahead of Paul in the polls.
__________________
We must be the change we wish to see in the world -- Ghandi
http://www.rightminded.net
BenGarrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 06:53 PM   #4
Boone & Crockett
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in the west coast of New England
Posts: 13,132
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

He was asked to post this Ben. In my opinion there is nothing wrong with touting your personal favorite candidate here on the political forum. Many people are looking at alternatives rather than voting a straight red or blue ticket. Times are changing and politics is sliding deeper into the mud. New blood is refreshing for many of us looking for a better way. Like Bawana, I vote for the man rather than the party. If after all the debates I find Paul as the best candidate then he will get my vote. I have to admit I don't like any of the existing candidates. The more I hear about them the better chance I will have to find one I like. One of the bunch has to be a sleeper and Paul might be the one...only time will tell. I want one good man or woman to step up and save America.
__________________
Too busy with fishing to spend much time here.
Champlain Islander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 06:57 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,602
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Champlain Islander

In my opinion there is nothing wrong with touting your personal favorite candidate here on the political forum.
I agree. If and when a candidate emerges as one that I whole-heartedly support, you can bet that I'll be touting him (or her). I see no reason to go to constant considerable lengths to discredit every other candidate, however. Just my opinion. As I've posted before, there's actually a lot that I like about Ron Paul. What I do not like, and why I probably won't vote for him in the primary, is his idea of foreign policy. I would especially have a hard time voting for anyone who believes that we brought 9/11 on ourself because of our pre-9/11 action on Iraq, which I consider a pretty absurd reasoning (although that's a completely different thread for a different day, I'm sure).
__________________
We must be the change we wish to see in the world -- Ghandi
http://www.rightminded.net
BenGarrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 07:09 PM   #6
Boone & Crockett
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in the west coast of New England
Posts: 13,132
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

We all fight our fightsin different ways. CC's tactics are actually quite similar to what we are seeing from the campaign managers in most of the major candidates. Endless spin and sling that mud. The one thing that seems to be a constant is that none ofthe candidatesare very good. With so much mud slinging we are conditioned to pick a candidate because he/ she isn't that bad. Like I said earlier, pick the best of the worst. What the hell ever happened to truth, justice and the American way? [&:]
__________________
Too busy with fishing to spend much time here.
Champlain Islander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 07:09 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 217
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

Quote:
ORIGINAL: BenGarrett

Another case in point.

Next is John McCain. Then you'll have about 5 other GOP candidates to go after if your aim is a thread for each candidate currently ahead of Paul in the polls.
I just put up this request for BigTiny. Do you have a candidate Ben you want some dirt on? Heres some dirt on RP that they can be usedby fox if they edit right. They can make him a professional republican and call him adirty old man.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX8DvivnBH0&mode=related&search=
conner_condor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 07:29 PM   #8
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 217
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Champlain Islander

We all fight our fightsin different ways. CC's tactics are actually quite similar to what we are seeing from the campaign managers in most of the major candidates. Endless spin and sling that mud. The one thing that seems to be a constant is that none ofthe candidatesare very good. With so much mud slinging we are conditioned to pick a candidate because he/ she isn't that bad. Like I said earlier, pick the best of the worst. What the hell ever happened to truth, justice and the American way? [&:]
I really never considered myself part of RP campaign. I just believe in RP and the good he can do for our country. Also I don't believe I have spun any stories I posted. As for slinging mud, I am just the messenger, I don't write the stories.
conner_condor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 10:24 PM   #9
 
BigTiny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 3,145
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

Thanks for the post. Most informative. I knew Fred was a lobbyist and that he had a hand in Watergate, but that other stuff was news to me. This kind of stuff is why I like the politics forum!
BigTiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 10:47 PM   #10
Super Moderator
 
CalHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: El Dorado County California USA
Posts: 8,753
Default RE: BigTiny request of Fred Thompson.

Things are looking grim for Republicans and even grimmer for conservatives.[]
__________________
Jesus Christ--The reason for the season!

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a veteran.

If you're certain you know everything, there's little opportunity to learn anything.
CalHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So Fred Thompson is out... Sureisaniceskimask Politics 97 01-26-2008 10:16 AM
Fred Thompson biscuit jake Politics 17 06-22-2007 08:46 AM
Fred Thompson ajg6989 Politics 3 06-20-2007 06:20 AM
What about Fred Thompson Champlain Islander Politics 19 04-17-2007 06:49 AM
Fred Thompson in '08 A5Mag12 Politics 7 03-27-2007 05:10 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 PM.