Most "humane" cities (i.e... the most ANTI-hunting cities)

[ButchA]

I saw this on another hunting forum and decided to click on the link to see for myself. HSUS published a list of their 10 rated "most humane" cities.... Reverse that as the top rated MOST ANTI-HUNTING CITIES... [:@]

Example:
1) San Francisco, CA
2) Seattle, WA
3) Porland, OR
4) Washington DC
5) San Diego, CA
6) Los Angeles, CA
7) Boston, MA
8a) Tampa, FL
8b) Baltimore, MD
10) Riverside, CA

Click here if you want to get sick reading about these whacked out people in San Francisco....

http://www.hsus.org/about_us/awards/san_francisco_most_humane_city.html


Butch A.

[ipscshooter]

ORIGINAL: ButchA

I saw this on another hunting forum and decided to click on the link to see for myself. HSUS published a list of their 10 rated "most humane" cities.... Reverse that as the top rated MOST ANTI-HUNTING CITIES... [:@]

Example:
1) San Francisco, CA
2) Seattle, WA
3) Porland, OR
4) Washington DC
5) San Diego, CA
6) Los Angeles, CA
7) Boston, MA
8a) Tampa, FL
8b) Baltimore, MD
10) Riverside, CA

Click here if you want to get sick reading about these whacked out people in San Francisco....

http://www.hsus.org/about_us/awards/san_francisco_most_humane_city.html


Butch A.

Interesting that the folks in some of those cities aren't very humane to each other. Baltimore and Washington D.C.are 2nd and 3rd in the nation in homicide rates. But, they care about Bambi, and that's what's important.


Edit:

Just FYI, while HSUS is an anti-hunting group, the study you've cited doesn't address hunting at all, unless I missed something. Thus, I'm not sure that I would equate a "humane rating" with an "anti-hunting rating". Houston ranked around #20, and I'd bet we have more hunters here than most other major metropolitan areas.