I've been hearing these conspiracy theories about how it couldn't have fallen down as it was barely on fire, etc. But has anyone considered that two buildings with millions of tons of concrete collapsed close enough to it that it set building 7 on fire? Seems to me that building 7 may have fallen victim toan earthquake resulting from the twin towers falling down. Earthquakes take down buildings, if not right away, then shortly thereafter as the concrete structures are weakened/cracked. Do any of the conspiracy theorists, including Rosie, even acknowledge this effect? Seems to me that is much more plausible than suggesting that someone knew the twin towers would be hit, knew the buildings would fall down (even the firefighters didn't think they would come downAFTER they were hit, and Osama Bin Laden says he didn't realize they would come down either), andset charges throughout the building without being detected. All for what, insurance money?To me, such a suggestion denotes mental illness.
I don't have time to answer this. I'm too busy adding a thin layer of lead and aluminum tin foil to the inner walls of my bunker so that "they" can't monitor my thoughts when I am trying to argue this topic with the uninformed.
__________________
"Shoot him again....his soul is still dancing"
According to some we have the US government in bed with AlQueda. All the conspiracy theorists have the Murrah building being fitted with demolition charges by the feds so it would fall down when McVeighs' bomb went off. Then the feds shot down that passenger aircraft off the NE coast. On the way to get more tinfoil. Then it is off to the bunker. Drat!!! There is that black helicopter again!!!
My bunker is only partly underground(and in Wy but not here)[&o]i really need to dig it deeper& lline/supply it better etc.( but it is for practical reasons like living in a earthquake- nuclear strike zone & next to a super volcano etc)
But yep there are some real out there ideas& conspircy theories-ppls-( the innersider group? did it)out there..... Kat sung comes to mind[].
Shockwavesripple effects etc hmm Yesit is/was a wholelot of mass & energy being moved& released.
Hairyfrogfish?
'
__________________
Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.-- Ovid (43 B.C.-A.D. 18)
Things ain't what they used to be and probably never was. ~Will Rogers
Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday.
"Shouldn't someone tag Mr. Kennedy's 'bold new imaginative program' with its proper age?" "Under the tousled boyish haircut it is still old Karl Marx—first launched a century ago.
There is nothing new in the idea of a government being Big Brother to us all. R.Reagan-1960
Location: On an Island in the west coast of New England
Posts: 13,133
RE: Building 7's collapse on 9/11
I don't have a bunker and haven't found the need to get a tin foil hat yet. My Buck Rogers ray gun and Dickk Tracy watch will protect me from any unauthorized thoughts going either in or out of my head.
__________________
Too busy with fishing to spend much time here.
The bluprint of the twin towers was released from someone after many years of not being shown. What you will see is that there was no way it would of collapsed as it has done. The 911 commision report was bogus. The center of the twin towers was built with a skeleton of heavy iron and was not hollow as the report said. The center of the towers was weaved and structured to withstand multiple plane hits. The center of these two towers should of stood a couple of hundred feet in the air.(the skeleton steel center). They did not.
This buildings was brought down by small nukes placed in the basement and some key placed charges. Victims who survived the clean up after 911 became ill(many of them).What they found of their blood cells was the same as the victims of hiroshima survivors. Radition was the cause of their illness.
You have to remember that 3 weeks before 911 these building have been worked on. The security cameras was all shut down during this time. You all talk about this and the tin foiled hat people but refuse to look at the evidence.
Why is this? You ignore the facts placed before you. What are you people afraid of? I would post some very interesting facts and videos but for those who are afraid to look at it,would be a waiste of my time. To scared to believe what happened that day.
LOLOL! First I have heard of this lunacy, now nuclear bombs destroyed the twin towers! Why didn't Jack Baeur stop it?
Built to stand multiple hits, perhaps. But sustained extreme temperatures fed by enough jet fuel to reach the west coast WEAKENED the steel supports. Not melted orliquified, WEAKENED them to the point where they couldn't hold the intense weight. From there is was a domino effect like a cheerleading team's pyramid.
All that debris and dust in the air was enough to sicken anyone sucking it in for even a short period of time. If it was a nuke blast, everyone downwind of it would have become ill and the story would have been long exposed by Bush hating media.
What I DO like about such theories is that it shows the American people how lunatic the left fringe is. Such fear should keep the public for giving that fringe total control of our gubment.
LOLOL! First I have heard of this lunacy, now nuclear bombs destroyed the twin towers! Why didn't Jack Baeur stop it?
Built to stand multiple hits, perhaps. But sustained extreme temperatures fed by enough jet fuel to reach the west coast WEAKENED the steel supports. Not melted orliquified, WEAKENED them to the point where they couldn't hold the intense weight. From there is was a domino effect like a cheerleading team's pyramid.
All that debris and dust in the air was enough to sicken anyone sucking it in for even a short period of time. If it was a nuke blast, everyone downwind of it would have become ill and the story would have been long exposed by Bush hating media.
What I DO like about such theories is that it shows the American people how lunatic the left fringe is. Such fear should keep the public for giving that fringe total control of our gubment.
Explain this picture? Tell us how it got sludge on it and is so cleaned cut. For not melting something sure happened there.
Looks sheered off to me, like when too much weight causes it to break. That's on the bottom floor of the hundreds of millions of pounds of falling concrete and other materials, no? In every incident where millions of small events stem from one big one, you will find apparent inconsistencies if you look hard enough. That doesn't make them a grand conspiracy, particularly if you are suggesting the near impossibility of pulling off such a feat, with no good motive for taking such an enormous risk. None of this is to mention somehow being in cahoots with 19 terrorists in the first place, which itself is a ludicrous accusation. I take it you are one of those who also believe a missile hit the Pentagon, and that those people who were supposedly on the plane (including conservative commentator Barbara Olsen) must have been paid off to disappear without seeing their loved ones or quietly killed in secretwith no witnesses.
Building 7's collapse on 9/11
)
]
.
