logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2007, 02:04 PM   #1
 
Northwind~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 430
Default Animal Rights...

What do you guys think. I actually had a long debate with a rather crazy PETA member. After a while I just had to give up because it got too nutty for me. Apparently its immoral to eat meat. Also, according to this nutjob nature is immoral and wrong because animals consume others for nutrients. Other carnivorous and omnivorous speciesare wrong for eating other animals, but can be forgiven because they do not know any better. Also, according to this person, Darwin's theory of evolution, survival of the fittest, is a horrible, disgusting concept. This is a good example of thelack of sanity amongst these people. The scary part is that alot of them are otherwise educated, but lack fundamental common sense and logic.I tried over and over to explain that one can not apply morality or right and wrong to nature, that morals are guidelines of right and wrong concerning the actions of humans towards other humans and interactions between humans. The fundamental moral principles of Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all based upon these human ethical standards. I tried to explain that because of this, and because the consumption of meat is a natural product of speciation, it is not worthy of moral consideration. I also tried to explain that animals have no inherent rights or moral entitlements. The concepts of rights and morals are wholly human concepts. Humans developed these concepts as methods of regulating or controling the actions of humans towards other humans and interactions between humans, and that only humans have the mental and emotional capacity to comprehend these concepts. Therefore, other species are not subject to these entitlements.I feel that animals have no moral entitlements, but that we as humans with the capacity to feel empathy towards other sentient beings have an ethical responsibility to treat other animals with respect. I believe that ethics arebasic principlesof right and wrong that are intended to govern basic actions and activities. I personally distinguish ethics from morals.I feel that morals are fundamental standards of right and wrong that have deeper emotional, often religious roots that are set to govern the interactions between people and dictate how people should live their lives. Your thoughts?
__________________
=}}}}}}::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::}>
Northwind~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 02:22 PM   #2
Boone & Crockett
 
Aught Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 13,219
Default RE: Animal Rights...

"Animals have the right to remain eaten. Any noises they make probably will not be used against them in a house of slaughter. They have the right to be tasty. If they cannot afford to be tasty, flavoring will be provided for them."

Know your rights!
__________________
Matthew 18:3-6
Aught Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 02:26 PM   #3
 
j_beste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Todd County, Minnesota
Posts: 347
Default RE: Animal Rights...

I think you put forward a good case to this nuttjob. It just shows that some people are beyond hope, reason, and common sense. There are more and more of these people every day.
__________________
Venison is good.

j_beste
Bowtech Patriot
j_beste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 02:37 PM   #4
 
NiceAndBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 239
Default RE: Animal Rights...

the fact that they said even animals are being immoral by eating each other is incredible! i dont think a lot of ppl in PETA actually agree w/that statement (i could be wrong tho) but it just shows u how nuts some of them really are.

it amazes me how something man has been doing for thousands of years is all of a sudden immoral in the past 50yrs or so. soon they might say pooping is wrong b/c we don't need to eat solid food, we should just drink liquids.
__________________
"Animals: fun to pet, better to chew."
-Jim Gaffigan
NiceAndBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 05:05 PM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
Canuck_Buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,913
Default RE: Animal Rights...

Individuals such as this PETA type complainer were probably traumatized by a hamburger as a child.
__________________
Happiness is a warm gun.
Canuck_Buck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 06:26 PM   #6
 
Northwind~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 430
Default RE: Animal Rights...

Oh, and by the way, that PETA nutjub called me a speciesist. You know, like racist, except speciesist forfavoringthe human species over others. [&:][>:][:@][:'(]

That came as a result of me trying to describe why humans alone have moral entitlements etc.
__________________
=}}}}}}::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::}>
Northwind~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2007, 09:07 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4
Default RE: Animal Rights...

Someone better tell these pelicans aboutbirds onbirds doesn't look good for them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNNl_uWmQXE
picture_this is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 05:49 AM   #8
Giant Nontypical
 
BTBowhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW PA USA
Posts: 7,220
Default RE: Animal Rights...

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Aught Six

"Animals have the right to remain eaten. Any noises they make probably will not be used against them in a house of slaughter. They have the right to be tasty. If they cannot afford to be tasty, flavoring will be provided for them."

Know your rights!
ROTFLMAO!!
__________________
Cant wait for 2012!

If guns kill people, spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat!!!
BTBowhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 06:10 AM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,955
Default RE: Animal Rights...

This individual you were debating obviously has a very unrealistic idea that somehow or other his/her PETA extremist philosophy trumps nature. I think it would be a considerable waste of time to think you could ever convince someone so far out of the mainstream of his/her error.

It's not a problem until you realize that our children are being indoctrinated with these kinds of ideas in our schools. If I can remember, I'll have my daughter add her comments to this thread when she gets home from school.
__________________


I'll drink to that
cr422 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 06:17 AM   #10
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,547
Default RE: Animal Rights...

If the animal rights nutjobs were ever to live up their own BS philosophies they would all be leaping off of cliffs like lemmings out of shame for what we as a species have done to the animal kingdom. Personally, I dream of such a day coming to pass and will gladly offer the first to the edge a push out of respect for their resolve...
__________________
Kevin Haendiges
NAHC Life Member
NRA Member
Wildlife Forever Member
GOA Member
Buckmasters Member
http://hunting-indiana.com
kevin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Animal rights and God burniegoeasily Politics 4 05-08-2007 05:37 PM
Another Look At Animal Rights Aught Six Politics 7 03-21-2007 05:36 AM
Animal Rights Activists at it in Pa. PABuck_HNTR Northeast 1 02-13-2007 11:07 AM
Another Animal Rights Group???? Mighty Sheowatha Politics 1 01-15-2002 11:20 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:44 AM.