logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-08-2007, 10:35 AM   #1
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 497
Default Wikipedia proven unreliable

NEW YORK "” Wikipedia, the controversial online encyclopedia, is planning to ask its army of faceless Internet editors "” known as Wikipedians "” to verify their credentials after one of the most prolific of their number was exposed as a fraud.



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,257340,00.html

american pride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 10:39 AM   #2
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,602
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

Wikipedia, written by a network of faceless and virtually anonymous contributors, is unreliable? Well now there's an earth-shaking revalation.

Wikipedia is like so much of the rest of the Internet: It's a great tool for some quick research, but verify everything.
__________________
We must be the change we wish to see in the world -- Ghandi
http://www.rightminded.net
BenGarrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 10:41 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ryland Addy
Posts: 55
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

Quote:
Welcome to Wikipedia,[/align]the free encyclopedia thatanyonecanedit.[/align]1,675,855 articles in English[/align]
[/align]Yeah its a big secret that anyone can edit it,, great piece of investigative journalism that Fox news is.
Blueshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 10:42 AM   #4
 
Sureisaniceskimask's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Flowery Branch, GA
Posts: 848
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

So what? It's still a fantastic source of information. People just shouldn't be writing reports and stuff and using it as a source...
__________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it." -Thomas Paine

So I said "Do you love me?" & she said, "No, but that's a really nice ski mask."
Sureisaniceskimask is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 10:49 AM   #5
Giant Nontypical
 
Knightia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wy
Posts: 7,516
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

Weird Donald really does have a face?
__________________
Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.-- Ovid (43 B.C.-A.D. 18)

Things ain't what they used to be and probably never was. ~Will Rogers

Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday.


"Shouldn't someone tag Mr. Kennedy's 'bold new imaginative program' with its proper age?" "Under the tousled boyish haircut it is still old Karl Marx—first launched a century ago.
There is nothing new in the idea of a government being Big Brother to us all. R.Reagan-1960
Knightia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 11:03 AM   #6
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,554
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

Wikipedia is controversial to Fox News as it is a free service. I'll do the math. Conservative Media outlet + successful free service = controversy.
Red Lion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 11:15 AM   #7
Boone & Crockett
 
Aught Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 13,219
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

I've been policing Wikipedia since its inception. Can you believe that someone anonymously edited one of my corrections tothe Moon article? Everyone knows that only the dark side is made of cheese (a blend of pepperjack, brie, and an experimental forebearer of Velveetaâ„¢). It's moister on the dark side since the sun can't reach it. Spectral analysis proves all of this without a doubt. I guess you just can't educate those who don't want to be educated.
__________________
Matthew 18:3-6
Aught Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 11:16 AM   #8
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ryland Addy
Posts: 55
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

What an Irony that Faux News would report on a source being "unreliable"???

Now THAT's funny!


Blueshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 11:22 AM   #9
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 10,257
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Blueshark

What an Irony that Faux News would report on a source being "unreliable"???

Now THAT's funny!
Blah Blah Blah... They're no less reliable than any of the other cable news media sources. You guys on the left just don't like hearing anything from the other side.
ipscshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 11:28 AM   #10
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,554
Default RE: Wikipedia proven unreliable

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Aught Six

I've been policing Wikipedia since its inception. Can you believe that someone anonymously edited one of my corrections tothe Moon article? Everyone knows that only the dark side is made of cheese (a blend of pepperjack, brie, and an experimental forebearer of Velveetaâ„¢). It's moister on the dark side since the sun can't reach it. Spectral analysis proves all of this without a doubt. I guess you just can't educate those who don't want to be educated.
"M-O-O-N" that spells some cheese.
Red Lion is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tried And Proven N2D Bowhunting 4 03-28-2008 04:42 PM
"Proven Whitetail Tactics" nodog Bowhunting 18 03-13-2005 12:55 AM
BEST broadhead for elk? Proven success montana_hunter_16 Bowhunting 14 05-24-2004 10:15 AM
Please Help! Tired of unreliable work! 1 Eye Technical 15 08-19-2003 06:17 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 AM.