If Clinton was still President

[american pride]

[/align]Do you believe we would still have this [/align]anti war movement in America?[/align]

[BillyMack]

Yep!. Just from the other side. "Politcs" as usual. [:'(]

[american pride]

ORIGINAL: BillyMack

Yep!. Just from the other side. "Politcs" as usual. [:'(]

Really?[/align]I don't remember [/align]seeing protesters in the streets [/align]when Clinton sent troops into Eastern Europe![/align]

[Red Lion]

ORIGINAL: american pride


[/align]Do you believe we would still have this
[/align]anti war movement in America?
[/align]

If the same course had developed with Clinton in office, then yes it would be similiar.

[BenGarrett]

Yes, I think so.

[Buster T]

Clinton would have never overthrown Iraq

NEVER

[LBR]

I think it would be a moot point. If the polls didn't overwhelmingly support an invasion, he wouldn't have called for it; and if polls showed disapproval, he'd pull them out. There would be some protest--think having a war without protest is about as possible as having a war without killing--but nowhere near what it is now.

Chad

[BenGarrett]

ORIGINAL: Buster T

Clinton would have never overthrown Iraq

NEVER

Disagree. Clinton was ready to use military force against Iraq in 1998 because of the supposed WMD program.

[t roy]

ORIGINAL: BenGarrett

Disagree. Clinton was ready to use military force against Iraq in 1998 because of the supposed WMD program.

I agree with buster, and depending on who you talk to some people believe his lack of action in response to other attacks such as the first bombing of the World Trade center and the bombing of the USS Cole lead to 9/11.

[LBR]

Clinton was evidently convinced of the fact that Saddam had WMD's, but he lacked the.........approval rating (yeah, that's it) to take action.

Chad