TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran's supreme leader said Thursday that if the United States were to attack Iran, the country would respond by striking U.S. interests all over the world.
The comments by Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei came the same day that another top official, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Javad Zarif, warned in a column in The New York Times that efforts to isolate Iran would simply backfire on the United States, increasing sectarian tensions in the volatile Middle East, including Iraq.
I believe they will hit back. And they have every right to do so. It's not goanna be pretty when US attacks them. But who side will most people be on? I will have to say Irans side. Any court would back the one who was assaulted first. The US will have very few supporters if they attack iran, that is guaranteed. We can sit back and watch it on our tv set though and say wow did you see that. Just for our amusements. I guess it won't be all bad. Some good live entertainment for a change.
Iran has been mouthing off for over 25 years. I remember the rant after Israeli planes bombed their nuclear reactor. They said that Israel would cease to exist and they would push them into the sea. Blah, Blah, Blah. I guess you would just mind your own business until they Nuke somebody and then you would blame it on Pres. Bush. I know, let's have the UN take care of them.
__________________
Never corner anything meaner than you are!
I guess you would just mind your own business until they Nuke somebody and then you would blame it on Pres. Bush.
It is Bush's fault! Where have you been? It's Bush's fault that Iran might have nuclear weapons and we haven't taken them out, and it's Bush's fault that North Korea might have nuclear weapons and we haven't taken them out. It's also Bush's fault that Iraq might've had WMDs and we did take them out.
Yeah, I know it's a double-standard and it doesn't make sense to me either, but you know the ultralibs. I guess it's 'cause Bush didn't go to Iraq thinking they might've had WMDs, he just went to Iraq to stick up for his daddy. He just used the WMDs as an excuse. He lied about them. Clinton was using the same WMD talk to build support for an invasion of Iraq in 1998 but Clinton didn't lie. Clinton's WMD intelligence was solid but sometime between 1998 and 2003, Saddam went from having WMDs to having never had them to start with. Don't worry about trying to make sense of that last sentence, you'd have to be an ultralib to understand. It used to confuse the hell out of me until some of our board members taught me their simple and undeniable logic, and using that logic, EVERYTHING makes sense. Bush is just a crack addict and a drunk and a dumbass (well, not too big a dumbass; he duped 200 million Americans into thinking Saddam had WMDs, but a dumbass nevertheless).
__________________
We must be the change we wish to see in the world -- Ghandi
http://www.rightminded.net
Thanks Ben,
I am now enlightened and understand all bad is GW's fault in the world. I am now mailing my check to the UN Food for Oil program, Voting online for ALGORE to win an Oscar and lining up weekend golf with George Soros. I feel so free. I might stop and look at a Hybrid car on the way home from work. Oh yeah, I also now know I'm a Vegan.
__________________
Never corner anything meaner than you are!
Clinton's WMD intelligence was solid but sometime between 1998 and 2003, Saddam went from having WMDs to having never had them to start with.
Ben your still confused no one said he never had them to start with he had them when he gassed the Irianians we sent Rumsfiels over with gifts and to take pictures with him. He had them when he gassed the Kurds we made our troops sit on their hands and do nothing. He just didn't have them when we decided to invade.
__________________
You're only one post away from a federal watch list.
Ben your still confused no one said he never had them to start with he had them when he gassed the Irianians we sent Rumsfiels over with gifts and to take pictures with him. He had them when he gassed the Kurds we made our troops sit on their hands and do nothing. He just didn't have them when we decided to invade.
So when did he get rid of them?
__________________
We must be the change we wish to see in the world -- Ghandi
http://www.rightminded.net
Iran: We'd hit back at attacker
