Why Accept Fact When It Gives Less Reason To Hate?

[Aught Six]

Theory for mass deaths roils Mexico


By MARK STEVENSON, Associated Press Writer
Sun Jan 7, 12:54 PM ET

[/align][/align]MEXICO CITY - Mexicans have long been taught to blame diseases brought by the Spaniards for wiping out most of their Indian ancestors. But recent research suggests things may not be that simple.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070107/ap_on_sc/mexico_ancient_plague

[Canuck_Buck]

interesting article....

[mr-pirk]

That is an interesting title to your thread Aught Six. Why accept a fact like a person, knowing that almost ¾ dog attacks were by pit-bull type dogs, further refined to show that almost ½ of the attacks over the last 25 years were by pit-bill terriers isn"™t being cowardly to be cautious around the dog but rather he is seeing the dog"™s history for what it is?
Perhaps a thinking person, knowing those stats and wondering about your choice to own a pit bull anyway, should look at you funny?

Why accept the fact that your choice of dog is a more dangerous breed, if it gives you less reason to hate those who believe the breed should be outlawed?

Perhaps you think this post is a non-sequitur, but refusing to see the nose on your face is always the same.

A message from your local coward doing cowardly acts.

Mr-Pirk

[Aught Six]

You're not really helping your argument by repeating yourself in an off-topic thread. If you want to argue some more, go to the proper one.