[Deleted]

Deleted User · 12-07-2006, 07:41 AM

[Deleted by Admins]

James B · 12-07-2006, 07:49 AM

I can see no reason for limits as long as the person who is appling for the job knows what is going on. Of course the persobn appling probably has the right to know the same things about the boss. Don't ask questions that you wouldn't want to answer yourself.

Deleted User · 12-07-2006, 07:50 AM

[Deleted by Admins]

Deleted User · 12-07-2006, 07:52 AM

[Deleted by Admins]

James B · 12-07-2006, 07:55 AM

That info should remain between these two parties. However we all know that there is no way to hold either side to that. Leaking is the American way.[:@]

vc1111 · 12-07-2006, 07:57 AM

As far as their checkbooks say they can go.

If you want "them" to pay the freight on benefits, you dance to their tune or pay your own.

Furthermore, an employer has a right to have employees give 100% by showing up to work prepared to work, not hungover from drugs or alcohol.

Business is not welfare. It is a "for profit" entity.

Great thread.

Deleted User · 12-07-2006, 08:01 AM

[Deleted by Admins]

Deleted User · 12-07-2006, 08:18 AM

[Deleted by Admins]

burniegoeasily · 12-07-2006, 08:25 AM

Employment is a privilage, not a right. I know lots of people who have refused jobs because of employee policy. They did not want to abide to the policy, so they simply found another job. Its kind of a double edged sword, but employers have individual freedoms just like everyone else. I can see a problem with discrimination due to race, religion, or creed. Which I can see turning into yet another issue here.

Think about it, can a Christian organization refuse employment to a Muslim, or visa-versa????

Deleted User · 12-07-2006, 08:27 AM

[Deleted by Admins]