[Deleted]

[Deleted User]

[Deleted by Admins]

[Canuck_Buck]

passing on the truth....LOL...hindsight is 20-20....

[Deleted User]

[Deleted by Admins]

[Lanse couche couche]

Is there actually definitive truth that the allegations are either true or false. Or is this more of the same old partisan "he said, she said" that has been giving me migraines for the last 13 or 14 years?

[Deleted User]

[Deleted by Admins]

[Canuck_Buck]

ORIGINAL: Ifferd

Did you check the link I posted?

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/enron.asp

If that doesn't convince you, you probably think Fox is objective.


[&:][&:][&:]

Snopes? Is this a rumor-mill site?....

[Lanse couche couche]

Iff,

Websites with a lot of cut and paste commentary have never impressed me as unimpeachable sources. If those accusations about Clinton and Enron are untrue as the website argues, then wonderful. You might be surprised to hear that I think he was an okay president. But, I would like to see some more substantial proof whether it be pro or con.

And no, I don't really think that Fox is any more, or any less, objective as any other TV news outlet. Are there news outlets, for example, Dan Rather and company that you find to be of superior objectivity?

[Deleted User]

[Deleted by Admins]

[Lanse couche couche]

Iff,

The accusation is that the Enron Chair "stayed" at the White House 11 times. The website argues that the Enron chair was never an "overnight" guest at the White House. I would be interested in seeing a site that would simply verify or debunk the issue of whether or not the Enron chair made multiple visits to the White House. I'm interested in facts not semantics in this instance.

[BenGarrett]

Which is more damning . . . a "lie" posted by a member that "passes the buck" from Bush to Clinton, or impossible to prove accusations (read: lies) that Bush was involved with Enron posted by another member?