Taz, it isn't the complexity of the test that was ever the question or hurdle. It was the 12 hour classroom time.
Did you read the previous thread I posted on this subject? I support the course but only if someone is serious about
continuing to hunt beyond the mentor program that has now been implemented.
As to "enforcement" I'm not sure where you're going with this. Of course enforcement requires a game warden in the field just as enforcement of the regular licensing requires. I don't see why you would even mention enforcement as a variable in the equation.
Read Iff's post again. It tells the tale of promoting hunting vs creating barriers for those that might be interested, but aren't sure and thus do not want to expend 12 hours of classroom time.
Quote:
Here, a child may huntunder the supervision ofa licensedadult without purchasing a license themselves till the age of 16, by which time they must have taken and passed the NC Hunter Ed. course.
|
Also note the stats he posted and compare them to other states. Also note that the exponential increase in the deer herd and turkey population in Ohio has done little to dramatically increase the numbers afield. In fact, the demographics arguably show that hunting is destined to decline sharply in coming years as the average age of a hunter increases. Younger people are simply not entering the sport at the same rates as others are leaving. Its ABC stuff, and the classroom time is surely a variable here and elsewhere.
The issue is as simple as the nose on your face. People want to try hunting a few times and perhaps even try a few different types of hunting prior to investing 12 hours of classroom time.
Read carefully my initial post on this thread. The people that created and sponsored this bill are not novices.