Some of the arguments that the pro-illegal immigration groups are pushing is that these groups are "essential" for our economic growth. Our economy would flounder if they were not here to "save" us. Usually, USUALLY this comes from a liberal or democrat that has historically been in the corner of safer workplaces, child labor laws, and wages for unions, and the ever polular "living wage". The illegal immigration arguments renders all those previous stances moot. The illegals are usually under 18 as well and it is a violation of child labor laws to employ them, and if under 16 I believe it is child endangerment.
So, here is an argument from50-100years ago complaining how not using child labour would be bad for the economy and it would collapse. Sound familiar??
Quote:
The real issue:
"Lobbyists for business will disagree of course, but their claims of doom and gloom are nothing new. Forty years ago, for instance, California tomato farmers said that their industry would cease to exist if the foreign-labor program of the time "“ the Bracero Program "“ were ended. Instead, farmers invested in harvest machinery, causing output to quadruple and the real price of tomato products to fall.
Fifty years before that, the textile industry predicted disaster if child labor were ended: in fact, at a Senate hearing in 1916, one mill owner said that limiting child labor would "stop my machines"; another said "investors would never receive another dividend"; while a third said that ending child labor would "paralyze the country."
America's economy has done just fine without child labor, and it'll do just fine without more foreign labor...
...It's time to try something new: Attrition through enforcement."
From 50 years ago ending child labor. The same arguments are being used to promote "illegal immigration".
Very good article here:
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0329-21.htm
|