Whos in the 5% bracket in here?????

[johnnyBgood]

Did bush mislead the public?????????

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8248969

[DougMD]

Nobody has proven he was the only one in the world who "knew" Saddam didn't have WMD's. That's a hard case to make, given statements by Kerry, Kennedy, and other far left commies stating that Saddam had to be disarmed.

I'm in that 5%, and believe if he was h&ll bent on going in, he wouldn't have given Saddam a way to get out of the invasion (step down, show he destroyed the WMD's etc.). It's a tough call right now to say definitively that the war has been worth it, but if democracy prevails in the middle east, Bush may be looked upon by history as one of our greatest Presidents. He made the best decision with the best information he had at the time.

As for impeachment, he might already be impeached by democrats if he did nothing and Saddam aided a terrorist who killed tens of thousands of innocent Americans in an attack by now...

[BenGarrett]

ORIGINAL: DougMD
As for impeachment, he might already be impeached by democrats if he did nothing and Saddam aided a terrorist who killed tens of thousands of innocent Americans in an attack by now...

Isn't that the truth? Honestly, the Democrats would be looking for a way to impeach Bush even if Iraq and Saddam Houssein had been non-issues during his terms in office. The actions of the Democrats in Washington right now amaze me.

Frankly, the Republicans can blame themselves: They set the precident for this impeachment business by impeaching Clinton when they had no business dragging the country through that. At least, however, they had a sustainable charge to go on. The Democrats have nothing where Bush is concerned. They have speculation, and plenty of that, but that's it.

As for 5%, Johnny, if you believe that the MSNBC's website truly reflects the beliefs of the American people, and that only 5% of us believe Bush was telling the truth, you're even more misguided than I believed.

[NCOutdoors]

Did bush mislead the public?????????

It's MSNBC for goodness sake. Ask the same question on foxnews.com and you'll get a completely different answer.

Where's the proof that he lied?

[hillbillyhunter1]

Nobody has proven he was the only one in the world who "knew" Saddam didn't have WMD's.

That would be impossible to prove in any case and also irrelevant. If he knew, he lied. That simple.

[hillbillyhunter1]

I'm in that 5%, and believe if he was h&ll bent on going in, he wouldn't have given Saddam a way to get out of the invasion (step down, show he destroyed the WMD's etc.).

If Saddam never had any WMDs in the first place then how could he show he destroyed them??????

[kevin1]

So what are you trying to say ?

[James B]

No he didn't mislead the people. According to the liberals, he is not smart enough to mislead the whole country and world.

[burniegoeasily]

I still believe he had them. 14 years is a lot of time to find hiding places. Not that im backing Bush, just saying, if you go snooping around Siria, you just might be surprised.

[burniegoeasily]

Now thats funny kevin.