"Taking the summer off, gonna do lots of fishing", "I'm gonna get my un-employment checks and just take it easy for awhile", "I was retiring April 1st anyway so it doesn't really matter too me", "We are going to pick up our checks and just go shopping"...
Doesn't sound like they were all that worried about being chitcanned in the first place if you ask me!

Typical union mindset, all they were worried about was what was in it for them, screw the rest of the world. More concerned about healthcare costs than what they would do for the rest of their lives. And they wonder why American factories are leaving like flies from poision. It aint JUST about labor costs and regulations!!!
Before some of you get all puffy chested and start badmouthing Winchester just remember two things. 1). Winchester Olin, the ammo maker is NOT the same company as USRAC, U.S. Repeating Arms Company was the name of the company who built the guns. They (USRAC) paid for the rights to name their guns "Winchester" (paid too Win Olin). And 2). USRAC is a directly owned subsidiary of Herstal Group/Miroku which is a French/***anese holding company who also own Browning! So "lil ol Winchester" aint the guilty party in this mess.
I think several reasons exist for Winchesters demise, much of which I believe is because Herstal/Miroku spent much more time and devoted much more money too Browning for the last 2 decades. BUT look at what Browning has done in the last 20 years vs Winchester. So who was right?
I suppose it will be just as it was... "Winchester Repeating Arms" was just a name from 1964-2006 and I believe that Herstal's agreement extended through nextyear. At some point in the future I think someone else will come along and pick back up the Winchester gun name as we know it. But then again it will just be a licensed name more than a true gun, just as it has been for the last 42 years!
RA