logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-31-2006, 10:30 AM   #1
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,602
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2006, 10:44 AM   #2
Boone & Crockett
 
Aught Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 13,219
Default RE: Identify this picture (part VII)

It's a jerboa. The first dictionary I had as a kid had a drawing that looked almost identical to that photo. I remember laughing immensely at the animal's name.
__________________
Matthew 18:3-6
Aught Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2006, 10:49 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,602
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2006, 10:54 AM   #4
Boone & Crockett
 
Aught Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 13,219
Default RE: Identify this picture (part VII)

Quote:
You're persactly right!!

Now that was fast Aught, I'm impressed. This is an obscure animal most have never seen or heard of.
To be fair, the link has the animal name in it. But the pic brought back a lot of happy memories ofmy early nerdhood. What five year old doesn't get a kick out of saying "jerboa" ten times fast?

Quote:
I was hopingThe Mindcat would offer hisopinion on this obvious scientific "fabrication".
He himself is a scientific fabrication, so it's in his interest to withhold the truth.

Quote:
Have you ever hunted them?
Nah, not yet. Still have my hands full with the tree rats.
__________________
Matthew 18:3-6
Aught Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2006, 04:28 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 598
Default RE: Identify this picture (part VII)





Scientific classification





Kingdom:
Animalia


Phylum:
Chordata


Class:
Mammalia


Order:
Rodentia


Superfamily:
Dipodoidea


Family:
Dipodidae


















I am suposing a Jerboa has always been a Jerboa. It can likely interbreed with other Dipodidae's

It was never a horse, it will never evolve into an elephant and it can't add and subtract





The Mind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2006, 05:17 AM   #6
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,547
Default RE: Identify this picture (part VII)

Mind , say this word 3 times fast "EOHIPPUS"
It will never sound like "HORSE" , but that's exactly what it was , the forerunner of the modern horse. The link between the two has been indisputably proven through the fossil record(transitional fossils , yeah I said it)and by intense study by people whoactually do know what they're talking about. No , it will never take your order at the drive through window in your lifetime , but a million years from now ...
__________________
Kevin Haendiges
NAHC Life Member
NRA Member
Wildlife Forever Member
GOA Member
Buckmasters Member
http://hunting-indiana.com
kevin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 06:29 AM   #7
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 598
Default RE: Identify this picture (part VII)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eohippus

Hyracotherium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Eohippus)[/align]Jump to: navigation, search[/align]


[/align]Hyracotherium, the ancestor of all modern horses, was only 20cm (0.6 feet) in height[/align][/align][/align]Hyracotherium ("mole beast") is considered to be the earliest known horse. It was dog-sized and four-toed. It lived in the Northern Hemisphere (in Asia, Europe, and North America) during the Eocene, between 60 and 45 million years ago.
The first fossils of this tiny horse were found in England by the famous paleontologist Richard Owen in 1841. He did not have a full specimen, didn't realise what he had, and called it "mole beast". When a full specimen was discovered later it was given the more fitting name Eohippus ("dawn horse"). It wasn't realised until later that the two finds were the same species. The first published name has priority as the official name. It should be noted that some scientists remain unconvinced that hyracotherium had any connection with horses.
Hyracotherium averaged only 2 feet (60 cm) in length and averaged 8 to 9 inches (20 cm) high at the shoulder. It had 4 hoofed toes on the front feet and 3 hoofed toes on each hind foot. The skull was long, having 44 long-crowned teeth. Hyracotherium is believed to have been a grazing herbivore that ate soft leaves and plant shoots.
In elementary level textbooks, hyracotherium is commonly described as being "the size of a small fox terrier." This arcane analogy was so curious that Stephen Jay Gould wrote an essay about it ("The Case of the Creeping Fox Terrier Clone") in which he exposed a situation that involved textbook plagiarism.



kevin1 said

Quote:
Mind , say this word 3 times fast "EOHIPPUS"
It will never sound like "HORSE" , but that's exactly what it was , the forerunner of the modern horse.
So you see, its NOT factually the forerunner of the horse. Its a theory that it is, a hypothesis. Its not fact. Read the above - 3 times


Quote:
The link between the two has been indisputably proven through the fossil record(transitional fossils , yeah I said it)and by intense study by people whoactually do know what they're talking about. No , it will never take your order at the drive through window in your lifetime , but a million years from now ...
See the above - its not fact that the little creature "evolved" into a horse. Its theory, not fact.

I thought you knew what you were talking about ?
[/align]
The Mind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 07:35 AM   #8
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,602
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 08:24 AM   #9
Dominant Buck
 
burniegoeasily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,185
Default RE: Identify this picture (part VII)



__________________
kaafir mushrik

Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.

J.F.K. hated liberals.
burniegoeasily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 09:13 AM   #10
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 598
Default RE: Identify this picture (part VII)

Quote:
So a 5 ton T-rex evolved into a 200 lb croc or a 100 lb Komodo dragon with totally different features?
No, the dinosaurs died out. They were reptiles - and reptiles were taken on the ark in the way of lizards, turtles etc etc. From those core reptiles and amphibians came what we have today by way of adaptation.

We all know things adapt - that I believe is a proven fact. That is NOT the same as evolution - adapting is kinda like survival of the fittest, where a certain color moth prevails over another after a fire in the forest etc. Those same months will never morph into a frog, or ape or chimp etc. they are still months and always will be.

Some species die out. Some species change. These things we KNOW. One animals totally changing into another ? The genetics of one animals radically changing so that its classified as another ? That don't happen folks - never
The Mind is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Deleted] Deleted User Hunting Gear Discussion 21 03-30-2004 12:35 AM
[Deleted] Deleted User Politics 14 02-23-2004 09:05 AM
[Deleted] Deleted User Big Game Hunting 16 02-16-2004 08:27 PM
[Deleted] Deleted User Politics 9 02-12-2004 06:05 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 AM.