[Deleted]

Deleted User · 03-07-2006, 10:12 AM

[Deleted by Admins]

The Mind · 03-07-2006, 10:38 AM

GW Bush has no say in whether abortion is legal or not. States like SD can pass legislation, and then the Supreme Court will be the ultimate deciders. GW might have a different view - but thats neither here nor there, and even with GW's view still 99% of all abortions would be stopped if made into law.

Also, Roe vs Wade I read has never been re-challenged at the Supreme Court level. The SD did kinda side step I read a WV ? ruling on parental consent saying the federal courts went too far by not allowing that - almost as if saying that abortion wasn't something that should be allowed and the Federal Courts should have allowed that law to pass.

Supreme Court dodged that one - they will not be allowed to dodge the South Dakota law.

Charlie P · 03-07-2006, 10:42 AM

I wonder if some will try and spin it like they did woth the AWB. It wasn't actually GWB that said it,it was his spokesman.

The Mind · 03-07-2006, 11:02 AM

Charlie P - exactly. What if, maybe, I heard and thats what we think isn't the same as " Bush Differs "................ damn get it right Ifferd !

Charlie P · 03-07-2006, 11:08 AM

Stealthy, Your kidding right?

The Mind · 03-07-2006, 11:35 AM

who ?

Deleted User · 03-07-2006, 01:06 PM

[Deleted by Admins]

The Mind · 03-07-2006, 01:22 PM

it will come ...........

hillbillyhunter1 · 03-07-2006, 01:34 PM

............................or not

North Texan · 03-07-2006, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Also, Roe vs Wade I read has never been re-challenged at the Supreme Court level.

Ever read Planned Parenthood v. Casey?

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=505&invol=833