Perhaps known as one of the greatest murder mysteries of all time, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy has for years intrigued scholars, authors and the average American citizen. The assassination can be classified into two distinct categories: method and significance. Few would argue that too much emphasis has been given to the method and very little to the significance. This is exactly how the perpetrators would like it to be. Photographic evidence along with eyewitness testimony has already conclusively proven that JFK was shot by more than one assassin. The Mary Mormon photo clearly shows the profile of a shooter behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll. It is obviously someone wearing a policeman's uniform {some speculate it was J.D. Tippit}. This was the fatal head shot. Two other bullets struck the President; the first one entered at the base of the throat and the second struck him in the back. While the positions of the assassins makes for a good game of clue, the more important issue is the significance of the assassination.[/align][/align]Many have speculated that the former Soviet Union, Cuba, the KKK, the Mafia, LBJ, CIA and the FBI all had strong motives to attempt this. However, given the connection of Lee Harvey Oswald to the CIA and Jack Ruby to the Mafia along with the altered autopsy reports, the evidence points to a coup de' dat by the CIA. They did it because they believed JFK was taking the United States on the wrong path towards dealing with communism. That is the reason why the cover-up has been sustained for so long. The perpetrators honestly believed they were doing the right thing for the United States at the time. The will of the people was discarded in favor of preserving the nation as they saw fit. Unfortunately, they didn't realize the long term effects of the assassination. One result was the increased power of capitalism over democracy. Profit has become more important than freedom. Corporations are more concerned with increasing the wealth of a select few than with promoting the general welfare of the very nation that allows them to conduct business. A second result has been the subordination of this nation's civil liberties to the private agendas of the powers that be. The only opinions that are accepted today are those that further the bottom line. Contrary opinions are discouraged and distorted by spin doctors. The only explanation for the lack of attention given to the significance of the assassination is because the government, the military and the media all know what happened and to expose the event for what it really was goes to the central core of what constitutes the United States of America.[/align][/align]
Im not sure that "Big Business" did not have JFK killed ...he wanted to take us out of Viet Nam ...and a lot of people were making BIG BIG money selling arms,ammo and everything else that is need during war such as oil ...
I saw a comprehensive study on it probably a month ago. Oswald was the only shooter. They DUPLICATED the shot that went through Kennedy and into the Governor with ONE shot from the same rifle, same distance and height as the book depository window, same lot batch of bullets that the actual ones came from, dummies that were of the same consistency of flesh and bone, etc. The bullet did the exact same thing except only hit but didn't PENETRATE the governor's thigh, but the test shothit two ribs, whereas the actual bullet hit one. Also, it was almost in the same condition. A slight bit more banged up, but again, it hit two ribs instead of one because the guy who shot hit only within a half inch or so of the actual shot (autopsy photos were reviewed).
They also had modern day film experts look at the "figure on the grassy knoll," and nobody was there even after contrasting, enhancing, etc. It was shadows, and they even went to the site and realized the individual would have had to be about 100 yards behind where the figure was to have had the trajectory.
My dad was the person that tested the weapon used in the assignation. He was the best shooter in the world at the time and was brought in.. I was too young to sick my nose in my Dad's business ( I was 12 ), but I remember him telling my mother one night, "They don't want to know the truth." He also told her, they will never know who did it..
Personally I believe Johnson had something to do with it.. or at least he knew about it..
I've read about comptitions where the same scenario was set up, the shooters had to use the same rifle that Oswald used, and had to fire the correct number of rounds in the same amount of time at moving targets.
Left handed Marines always ended up on top, and some of them even scored more hits than Oswald did.
__________________
Obamanfreude - 1. taking pleasure from the misfortunes of an Obama supporter as he or she is adversely affected by the policies of their Dear Leader.
I can't remember the name of the documentary, but I am telling you now, if you watched it there is NO way someone else was involved. It went through everyaspect including whose motorcade mic was left on, and how many shots were heard throughit, the holes in the clothes versus the bodies, etc. in the same position as they were seated. They could trace back thetrajetory and determinedall came from thewindow. The first one missed, the second went through Kennedy and into the gov, and at that time, the driver almost came to a complete STOP when the thirdone hit Kennedy in the head. Then you can see everyone get jerked back as the driver sped off with his head low.