Pro-Choice?

Goose 11 · 11-18-2005, 08:17 PM

If you are pro-choice, go check this out.

http://abort73.com/index.html

frizzellr · 11-18-2005, 08:27 PM

Not only should abortion be legal, retroactive abortion should be legal until a person reaches the age of 50.

boysda · 11-19-2005, 05:56 AM

thanks for the link.

still pro-choice.

static · 11-20-2005, 10:44 PM

Do you know why, in the war of Abortion, pro-choicers lead in the polls?

Only Survivors get to vote!

PAhunter86 · 11-21-2005, 02:17 AM

Abortion stops a heart from beating.

It's that simple.

burniegoeasily · 11-21-2005, 10:18 AM

I just want to know when the man is going to be given half the choice. Where does half the genetics come from of the proposed Choice ? The man. If we are allowing people to abort a child simply because it will cause an inconvenience, what about the guy? It will be a life of inconvenience to him, why only the women's choice? Don't give me the, "its her body", because it isnt. She is simply a vessel for a totally different being that is composed of only half her genetics and started with only one cell from here, and one cell from the man. The logic is so warped on this Pro choice idea.

I will always be prolife, simply because my two daughters were scheduled to be aborted until my wife and I stepped in. We adopted them, and a day does not go by that I think they were simply hours away from being vacuumed out of their biological mother. My kids are not, have not, and never will be simply a choice/ mistake.

Charlie P · 11-21-2005, 10:23 AM

Burn, The answer you would most likely get is "when a man can carry the child in their body."

burniegoeasily · 11-21-2005, 10:30 AM

Quote:

ORIGINAL: Charlie P

Burn, The answer you would most likely get is "when a man can carry the child in their body."

Yea, but that is such a lame excuse. When you put it all in perspective, The man will be burdened for over 18 to 23 years, if he did not want said kid, what is that compared to 9 months. IF we take a flipint additude about abortion, and that someones convience is all it takes to justify the death of a child, then it should be extended to all self indulged facets of life.[:'(]

Or, what about a man, like me, who would want their child, regardless what the Egg donor wants.

Charlie P · 11-21-2005, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Or, what about a man, like me, who would want their child, regardless what the Egg donor wants.

Regrettably at this time your sheet out of luck.

BenGarrett · 11-21-2005, 11:24 AM

I get incredibly tired of all the debate about whether a woman should or shouldn't be able to choose what she does "with her own body."

You know what? It IS her body. And I am firmly pro-choice! I believe a woman has every right in the world to decide whether or not to have sexual intercourse. When another life enters the equation, however, it is no longer just her body. There are now two bodies involved.

And I don't want to hear the old line about it not being life. My wife and I are expecting twins. When she was 10 weeks along, the ultrasound clearly showed both fetuses moving in the womb and moving their arms and legs. How anybody can look at that kind of video proof and say that's not life is beyond me.