logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-26-2005, 12:34 PM   #1
Dominant Buck
 
burniegoeasily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,186
Default Conoco Phillips

Conoco Phillips is fighting the second Amendment. I read about it in this months NRA Hunter mag. Ill try to find an on line article.

It is suggested to buy gas at other stations.
__________________
kaafir mushrik

Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.

J.F.K. hated liberals.
burniegoeasily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2005, 12:38 PM   #2
Dominant Buck
 
burniegoeasily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,186
Default RE: Conoco Phillips

here is an article. By the way, it was last month, not this month.

http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/Releases.aspx?ID=6223


The jist of the article is, employees of conocophillips were fired for having legal firearms stored in their cars. NRA is asking for a boycot.
__________________
kaafir mushrik

Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.

J.F.K. hated liberals.
burniegoeasily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2005, 01:02 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,602
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2005, 03:54 PM   #4
 
underdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 510
Default RE: Conoco Phillips

Burnie, You didn't read this carefully. And as usual, Ifferd is armed to the teeth with opinion but his arsenal is empty of facts.

Conoco didn't fire anyone and NRA doesn't have a suit filed against them. They have called for a boycott, though.

I've followed this deal from the beginning. This all started a couple of years ago at a Weyerhauser paper mill in Valliant, OK. Security guards did illegal searches of employees vehicles and fired twelve long-time employees for having guns in their trucks which they said was contrary to a new company policy. The employees say they were never notified of such a policy.

Both Dems and Repubs in OK are very pro-gun and the OK legislature passed a law the following session that prevented employers from denying their employees their Constitutional right of carrying legal firearms in their vehicles. Then Whirlpool Corp. filed suit against the state of OK to block the law from going into affect. The OK Chamber of Commerce and Conoco joined in the suit claiming it created undue liability for employers.

The following session the OK legislature passed another law addressing their concerns and relieving both employers and employees of civil liability if a gun were stolen from their vehicle and misused. This was an effort to get the corporations to drop their lawsuits. Whirlpool and the State Chamber did, but Conoco then joined suit against the state of OK to prevent the law from taking affect. And that's where it stands. BTW, Halliburton and Williams joined also, but Conoco was chosen for the boycott because Halliburton and Williams don't have retail consumers.

NRA has sued Weyerhauser to get the fired employee's jobs back and called for a boycott of Conoco.

Count me in on the boycott. How about you, Ifferd? Would you buy Conoco products? Do you support NRA?
underdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2005, 06:08 PM   #5
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 752
Default RE: Conoco Phillips

Quote:
ORIGINAL: underdog

Burnie, You didn't read this carefully. And as usual, Ifferd is armed to the teeth with opinion but his arsenal is empty of facts.

Conoco didn't fire anyone and NRA doesn't have a suit filed against them. They have called for a boycott, though.
looks like he read it carefully to me. no one said the NRA filed suit


s. il. hntr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2005, 06:42 PM   #6
 
underdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 510
Default RE: Conoco Phillips

Quote:
ORIGINAL: burniegoeasily

here is an article. By the way, it was last month, not this month.

http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/Releases.aspx?ID=6223


The jist of the article is, employees of conocophillips were fired for having legal firearms stored in their cars. NRA is asking for a boycot.
I believe burnie mistakenly said some Conoco employees were fired and none were. It was Weyerhauser that fired the employees.
underdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2005, 06:48 AM   #7
Dominant Buck
 
burniegoeasily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,186
Default RE: Conoco Phillips

Honestly, I read the article once in my NRA hunter magazine. I got the jist and want to post it here to see what everyone made of it.
__________________
kaafir mushrik

Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.

J.F.K. hated liberals.
burniegoeasily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2005, 06:53 AM   #8
 
underdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 510
Default RE: Conoco Phillips

I think it's great news that a bipartison OK legislature and Dem attorney general as well as NRA are fighting for the common man's constitutional rights.

NRA is working through their state affiliates to attempt to get legislation similar to OK's introduced in all fifty states.
I commend them for this, and see no problem with getting the ball rolling. But OK's legislation is still hung up in court. Hopefully they will prevail.
underdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2005, 07:29 AM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Posts: 1,150
Default RE: Conoco Phillips

Quote:
NRA are fighting for the common man's constitutional rights.
Underdog:

The NRA does fight for the 2nd Amendment. They are dead wrong in this case though. You don't have the Constitutional right to carry if the private property owner doesn't allow it. This is about private property rights not about the 2nd Amendment.

If the employees of Conoco don't like the policy, they can do one of three things. First, they can try to change the policy from within. Second, they can leave their firearms at home or third, they can tell Conoco to jam it and go work somewhere else.

NCOutdoors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2005, 07:38 AM   #10
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,602
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phil Phillips!!!!!!!! gutshot Bowhunting 29 06-28-2008 07:49 PM
Thanks Illinois Ray Phillips DoctorDeath Whitetail Deer Hunting 2 09-03-2007 09:12 PM
Phillips Preserve NJ hunting CatskillHuntr Northeast 1 05-31-2004 07:14 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 AM.