Quote:
|
Consanguinity (marriage between people that are blood relatives) has been practiced in the Middle East for over 100 generations, even before the introduction of Islam in the seventh century.
|
According to you, afer 10,000 years they'd be so mutated as to not even appear human, right Tard ? I mean, those huge defects ..... where are they ? Those people seem like normal humans to me, not differnt than you and me. lets see ......... you said
Quote:
|
Recessive bad genetic traits would crop their ugly heads up and you would be a family lineage of mutants
|
.
Quote:
RIGHT NOW, but what about 2nd or 3rd generation? The chances go up geometrically.
Within about 3 or 4 generations you would have one big eyeball and claws.
|
Quote:
|
1.5 to 2.5 % STEADY risk is not a big factor, geometric increase in risk IS a factor.
|
Quote:
|
BUT, it has already been shown that without the variability of male's DNA, this population of "amazon's" (ie: all women) would die out in about 3 to 5 generations because their immune systems would be so crappy.
|
Quote:
|
Good point, in Marshfield Wisconsin some backasswards woods folks were into incest and within 2 generations started some really funky health problems
|
.
Thats just some of your quotes that come across as fact.
yet the report you posted shows what ? 8,000 - 10,000 years of inbreeding and just now there is a theory that its causing some problems ? no club feet, no claws, no double heads or third feet tard ........ after 100 generations and you speculated that after 2,3 there would be.
Thoughts ?
Your posted article is one man's view, and what its telling me is after 8,000 - 10,000 years theres still no genetic issues to ammount to anything other than a suspicion that "other" medical complications "could" be "up to" 20% greater
Wow tard, thats some hard factual stuff there, isn't it ?
BTW - how does it feel to wake up, come to this message board and be spanked, the very first thing in the mornings ? You must be liking it, you keep coming back