[Deleted]

Deleted User · 03-04-2004, 05:20 PM

[Deleted by Admins]

bambikiller6 · 03-07-2004, 07:51 PM

are you saying they dont have to follow safe hunting, shooting, and handing laws?will the law "pointing a firearm' not even count?

stubblejumper · 03-07-2004, 08:12 PM

The next thing will be natives hunting with full automatic weapons and packing handguns wherever they go.What a mess this is becoming.

SwampTHING · 03-08-2004, 05:28 PM

Quote:

ORIGINAL: bambikiller6

are you saying they dont have to follow safe hunting, shooting, and handing laws?will the law "pointing a firearm' not even count?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

DID THEY EVER?

sawbill · 03-09-2004, 08:25 PM

For once in my life, I will side with the Indians if only for the reason that I want to see the gun gestapo lose more than I want the indians to lose.

bambikiller6 · 03-10-2004, 05:05 PM

you know its bad but you are right. but what happens when they win, the gun laws are gone and they are still free to have a 44 on the hip at the mall?

Wolf killer · 04-01-2004, 12:23 AM

Maybe I am just stupid, because I live in Montana & don't follow your news very often? From the sounds of it down here all gun owners won in Canada. If they can not enforce the law on the indian there laws must be weak? I don't think it is going to be as bad as you guys think? I will sit back & watch from my home in Montana. I hope it all works out for you guys.

tschaef · 04-01-2004, 03:15 PM

I gotta agree with Wolf killer, not that their victory proves the law is weak (the Liberals are too weak to admit a mistake), but a victory against the Liberals makes me feel all warm and squishy inside, even if it doesn't benefit directly.
Give it a year, then we can use their stats proving that natives unregistered guns where used to harvest lots of venison but no convenience store clerks!

bgunner · 04-01-2004, 04:16 PM

no in our constitution it separtes the native people from the rest of us .. there for they have different rights thank our fore fathers for that ...