Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob in VT
I am looking at a new scope for a 30-06. This is used for whitetails, mule deer, and elk. Considering the following:
Swarovski Z3 4-12x50 BRH Reticle
Leupold VX-3 4 - 12x50 B&C Reticle
Zeiss Conquest 3.5-10x50 Rapid Z 600 Reticle
The Swaro is $260 more than the Leupold and $175 more than the Zeiss. Is it really worth the extra coin?
. . . Rob
|
O.k this Swaro is not their top line model. I go out and say that now.
Its a model directed at competing with the Conquest and some of higher end scope makes and models. It is a nice scope for sure, you will be happy with it no question about it and you will never give it up. Do it if you want, I would spend it over the Leupold cause it is a over all better scope than the Leupold and you will see it in that price difference. .I don't know about the Zeiss though, it is brighter, but the Ziess will do everything (and than some) you ask of it to under legal hunting laws and conditions and you
won't regrett it.I would pick Ziess,only because of the Warranty.I'm not overly impressed with Swaros warranty.Both Leupold and Ziess offer a much better one, but reguardless a well built Swaro will stand the test of time. .I
personally would use that extra money you save on the Ziess and put it
towards top notch mounts for it.If you are happy with the way it will get mounted and that is not a concern buy the Swaro. It is brighter, but you will never really take full advantage of what it has to offer unless you go, to a place where you can shoot throughout the night when you compare this Ziess Conquest and this model of Swaro. But an extra 175 isn't all that
much if you have got it in your budget already.