[ol][*]Zeiss Conquest 3-9x 40 or 3.5-10x44[*]Leupold 3.5-10x40[/ol]
The Bushnell is going to be a lot heavier then either these 2..If it doesn't both you the 2.5-16x42 would be ok and I am sure it is at least a little better then the 4200's in optical quality. It hasn't been out as long as choice 1 or 2.
__________________
"Banning guns is an idea whose time has come."
- Joseph Biden
Associated Press 11/18/93
"Be thankful that we're not getting all the government we are paying for." Will Rogers
I've heard about some "issues" with the early production run of the new Elite 6500's. I would also (like oldelk) lean towards the Zeiss but, in all honesty, the Leuppy would be fine also.
__________________
If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.
i have the zeiss conqeust 3.5x10x50mm and i have to tell ya this thing is awesome,especially in low light with the larger objective.very crisp and clear,i don't know how much they are now but i got a heck of a deal on mine from doug at www.cameralandny.comsuper good to deal with.....Ted
__________________
Genesis 27:3 please take your weapons,your quiver and your bow,and go out to the field and hunt game -------------phil. 4:19 And my God shall supply all your needs
Leupold/Zeiss Or Bushnell PLease Help
