logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Outdoor Gear > Optics

Optics Quality optics are a must-have for any serious hunter. Discuss them here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2008, 10:40 PM   #1
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 102
Default Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

I am fixing to get into long range shooting, and my question is do adjustable objective give you a substantial advange? Im not competing or anything, just shooting for fun. I want an 800 yard gun, probably a .308, in the near future. I am also looking to top my AR-15 with a 4.5 x 14 scope, maybe a sightron I was looking at, but I would rather it not be AO unless you guys talk me into it. Thanks for the help.
mcfadden222 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008, 02:42 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MB.
Posts: 2,988
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

I haven"™t seen to many long range scopes without the adj. obj. lens. As for me I"™d rather not have an adjustable lens for my hunting rifle. One less thing to worry about...
trailer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008, 09:29 AM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,227
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

For regular BG hunting, I don't like AO scopes. Just something else to fiddle with at the moment of truth. For dirt dogs or long range targeting, I would see them as beneficial.
__________________
If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.
bugsNbows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008, 04:31 PM   #4
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,295
Send a message via Yahoo to Paul L Mohr
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

Depends on what I'm doing, but for shooting where I have the time and know the exact distance I like them. They are even better for shooting at closer distances with higher power scopes.

Paul
__________________
I didn't climb to the top of the food chain to eat carrots! (Ron White)
Paul L Mohr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008, 07:52 PM   #5
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

For long range, I require AO. You get past 400 yards, very slight movement of your head, you can see your crosshairs move off your target.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008, 10:02 PM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Garfield NJ USA
Posts: 3,067
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

For my varmint rigs I like them, I range landmarks and if Something pops into view then I set for a preranged spot. Works for me. For a hunting rifle shots usually aren't that far to make a difference.
__________________
Obama=The Fourth Reich,
Just look at the parallels of the Nazi regime and the Obama Administration amazingly similar arent' they.
thndrchiken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 01:47 PM   #7
 
kdvollmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 583
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

Only way to go if you ask me, even for your hunting rifles. I suggest keeping them on a lower power most of the time so you can see what you are shooting at close rnge if you jump a deer, or something else. Odds are, if you are at distance, and need to see something up closer, you will have the time to power up a higher magnification to see, and that the animal in question has not yet seen you either. Makes some shots safer in the sense that it will also allow you to know what you are shooting at in the lower light and the deer 2-3 or more feet in the edge of the woods.


__________________
Member: American Sniper Association (ASA)
Ducks Unlimited
Pheasants Forever
NRA


Without Warning, Without Remorse
kdvollmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 02:32 PM   #8
Nontypical Buck
 
Jeff Ovington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,781
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

All my scopes have adjustable objectives..
And because your thinking of a scope in a magnification of 4.5-14 power and,in terms of long range shooting at 800yrds I highly suggest you get it..
Like Big Country said if you shoot long range its nice to have
because it focuses on the target and eliminates parallax..
But they are really not really required on quality scopes of 10 power or less and targets at400yrds and less.
Yes I say you are one that requires one and the question I'd be asking is weather you adjustable ring bell, or a side focus adjument turret..
Personally I'd go with the latter cause you don't have to take your eye of the target or move your head while focusing two very importantant things while adjusting for parralax...
__________________
DONATE BLOOD TODAY.....PLAY HOCKEY
Jeff Ovington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 03:20 PM   #9
 
MichaelT.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Dorado, Arkansas
Posts: 2,174
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

I have not seen any true " long range " scopes without it. Although I set mine and leave them , as most of my shots are 200 yards and under, for long range 300 + yards, it is a necessary evil. I say that, because although as stated above it is just something else to have to mess with, it is necessary for long shots to get a true sight picture when using magnifications in the 14 - 20 range.

I don't think you would find a long range without it, but if you did I would still shy away from those scopes and get the adj. obj. scope for what you are wanting to do.

God Bless
__________________
PSE FireStorm lite - Blazer vains - Easton A/C/C 3-49 arrows - Muzzy 3 blade 100 gr. -
Hurricane release - Kwikee quiver - Whisker Biscuit - limbsaver silencing - Nikon Prostaff 440 rangefinder -
Nikon and Steiner Binocs - Cobra 3 pin sight
MichaelT. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 03:42 PM   #10
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Delaware OH USA
Posts: 535
Send a message via Yahoo to nksmfamjp
Default RE: Do you prefer an adjustable objective or not?

I do prefer adjustable objective scopes, especially the side focus models. You should consider these 2 things:
1. Magnification - AO becomes useful at about 12x for most long range shooting. At lower powers, our eye resolution just isn't good enough. On a 10x scope, IMHO, I don't really need AO. On a 40x scope, I would want it for all ranges of shooting.

2. Distance - My understanding is that at farther distances, the adjustment is very fine, but the error could matter more.I think the size of the error can be much greater at like 25 yards. That is why all airgun/22 target scopeshave AO and also whyshort range benchrest guys must have this feature. Of course, we are talking about holding groups under .1 MOA here. Not necessarily big game hunting.


So for big game hunting, I basically use rule 1 to decide if it is a needed feature.
nksmfamjp is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is an Adjustable Objective nessasary. whitetail_fanatic Optics 8 09-06-2008 01:37 PM
Side Focus/adjustable Objective tow2atm Optics 1 02-25-2008 07:30 PM
New Scope! Adjustable Objective??? JagMagMan Guns 12 11-20-2006 07:35 PM
Dr. Alt has new objective thecontractor Northeast 14 12-09-2004 04:22 PM
Adjustable Objective Higg Guns 2 02-26-2002 01:01 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 AM.