RE: bsa scopes
I have used several, never had one fail on me yet. However the optics are not the greatest, especially for the cheaper ones. If you get one of the more expensive models they are not half bad. I had a catseye on a slug gun and Inline muzzle loader. One of my buddies liked it so much he went and got one and replaced a cheaper Leupold with it. And the scope I had I ended up giving to another buddy. We set up an inline ML for him and ask him what scope he wanted. He said he wanted mine, asked if he wanted a model just like mine and he said no, he wanted the one off my gun. I think he was joking, but I did it anyway. It's still on the gun and working fine.
I do know of someone that had one fail, it wouldn't track right out of the box and he couldn't get it sighted in. He called BSA and they told him to send it in and they would replace it. A few days after he mailed it they called and told him they didn't have any of that model available to ship out, so they let him pick a different one from the next model line up and they would ship him that one instead. A few weeks after he got the new scope another one came in the mail. It was the model he originally had. It had a note with it saying he could keep both scopes and they were sorry about any inconvenience he may have had because of it.
Pretty good customer service if you ask me.
The cheaper ones are just that, cheap. However they are no different from a cheap tasco, barska, simmons or anything else. They are pretty much made in the same place anyway I bet, they just get a different name put on them.
If I were to get a cheaper scope right now it would most likely be a Bushnell, the Banners are pretty nice for the money. I have had pretty good luck with the cheaper Bushnell's compared to the simmons, tascos and others.
My opinion anyway.
__________________
I didn't climb to the top of the food chain to eat carrots! (Ron White)
|