logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Outdoor Gear > Optics

Optics Quality optics are a must-have for any serious hunter. Discuss them here.

View Poll Results: A poll
Nikon Buckmasters 3-9x40 8 34.78%
Burris Fullfield II 3-9x40 6 26.09%
Bushnell Elite 3200 3-10x40 9 39.13%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-03-2007, 07:55 AM   #1
Spike
 
HeadHunterII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 43
Default Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

I am currentlydeciding between these three scopes. A Nikon Buckmasters 3-9x40 with the BDC reticle, the Burris Fullfield II 3-9x40 with the Ballistic Plex reticle and the Bushnell Elite 3200 3-10x40 with the Multi-X reticle. All of them are competetively priced. I would like opinions on the quality of the glass, the lens coatings and the ability of the scope to stay on zero while riding on the back of a 7mm Rem Mag. I am already pretty much set on these three.

Any help is appreciated and I know that you guys probably get tired of all of the vs. threads so just bear with me!


HeadHunterII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 08:00 AM   #2
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamiltucky, OH
Posts: 486
Default RE: Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

You won't go wrong with any of them.

I recently checked-out a FFII, and was quite impressed by it. However, I didn't compare it to the 2 you mentioned, so I can't give it a nod or a slam.

Just to complicate things, I believe the Nikon Monarchs are being closed-out at many places at prices that are almost even with the Buckmasters. My understanding is that the Monarchs are a goodly jump in quality.

In any case, your eyes are the ones that count. I'd recommend checking them out (after focusing each for YOUR eyes!) at twilight at an outside target. I parked my car 300 yards away from the door, & put a recently shot target in the window. The scope I chose showed the bullet holes more clearly than the others.

Good Luck!

FC
__________________
Eschew Obfuscation!
Folically Challenged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 08:05 AM   #3
Spike
 
HeadHunterII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 43
Default RE: Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

That is a great tip, I may have to try that...
HeadHunterII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 02:16 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
r33h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 2,731
Default RE: Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

honestly can't say I have used the burris or the Bushnell, but I have used the Nikon and it is very, very clear. Extremely nice scope!
__________________
Remington Model 11-87 Premier 12 Gauge
Remington Model 870 SPS-T Camo Thumbhole 12 Gauge
Ruger M77 Mark II .270 w/ Nikon 3-9x40 Buckmasters
r33h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 02:39 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,554
Default RE: Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

I have heard good things about the Nikons and Burris, but own a Bushnell 3200 and it has been great on my .300 win mag, so biased and picked the Bushnell.
Red Lion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2007, 03:50 PM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
North Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 8,529
Default RE: Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

Of the three, I would pick the Buckmaster. But at the prices Monarchs are going for right now, that's what I'd be topping my rifle with.
__________________
You may beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride!
North Texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 07:03 AM   #7
Spike
 
HeadHunterII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 43
Default RE: Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

Thanks for the votes and words guys. I think I am going to take some advice and pick up a Nikon Monarch. I just got my new truck last night ('07 F-150 STX) so I can actually go out and pick up the new scope!

Once again, thanks for the help!
HeadHunterII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2007, 06:13 PM   #8
 
ConstructionWorker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 156
Default RE: Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

NIKON.
ConstructionWorker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2007, 06:30 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 159
Default RE: Nikon vs. Burris vs. Bushnell

I'm not too sure about the other two, but the Nikon is a very impressive scope for the price. I love the ones I have. You definitely won't go wrong in choosing the Nikon. Good luck.
clint802 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon Burris or Leupold HoytShooter95 Guns 34 08-22-2009 06:01 AM
Burris or Bushnell? Strut&Rut Whitetail Deer Hunting 5 10-13-2004 04:48 PM
Burris or Bushnell? Strut&Rut Guns 6 10-11-2004 08:51 AM
Burris, Nikon, or Bushnell Spotting Scope? bwortman Guns 1 02-09-2003 10:45 PM
Bushnell, Nikon or Burris? fisher_hunt Guns 6 11-13-2002 08:14 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:57 PM.