logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Regional Forums > Northeast

Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, CT, RI, MA, PA, DE, WV, MD, NJ Remember, the Regional forums are for hunting topics only.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-17-2010, 05:34 AM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Default Finally

At long last we finally have an outdoor writer that understands the problem with the current DMP. Here is a quote from an article by Walt Young.

Quote:
This is only the tip of the iceberg with respect to the terribly complex issue that is deer management in Pennsylvania. The main thing the Game Commission needs to do is get away from the forest regeneration model for managing deer numbers and start quantifying things for us hunters. And more hunters need a better grasp of the facts and reasonable science rather than dealing in emotion and opinions.
http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/co...id/527856.html

The data provided in the audit showed that reducing the herd in 2G by over 50% resulted in a decrease in regeneration rather than the expected increase. How can the PGC possibly manage the herd based on such questionable criteria?
__________________
In Miss. ,ARs reduced the average rack size of 2.5+ buck across the entire state
bluebird2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 08:05 AM   #2
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Morgantown WV USA
Posts: 108
Default

Question for you bluebird

how much worse would the regen have been in 2G if the GC had not reduced the herd 50%?

Put that in your crop and chew on it a while before you spit out your answer.


Wv Gino
WV Gino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 08:29 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
Default

Gino one would think that would be highly dependant upon how or if other factors were addressed. Such as changes made to timbering practices, other problems addressed etc..
Cornelius08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:21 AM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WV Gino View Post
Question for you bluebird

how much worse would the regen have been in 2G if the GC had not reduced the herd 50%?

Put that in your crop and chew on it a while before you spit out your answer.


Wv Gino

Neither you ,the PGC or DCNR has the answer to that question since the audit shows there is no correlation between deer density and forest regeneration. Put that in you pipe and smoke it!

Maybe you'd like to explain why regeneration decreased from 45% to 38% in 2G after the herd had been reduced. Remember, the DD is now 50% below what the same experts said was the carrying capacity of the habitat in 2G in 2003. Why did they change their mind and why didn't it work?
__________________
In Miss. ,ARs reduced the average rack size of 2.5+ buck across the entire state

Last edited by bluebird2; 03-17-2010 at 09:36 AM.
bluebird2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 07:37 AM   #5
Fork Horn
 
fellas2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 175
Default

I actually think the writer pretty much hits the nail on the head.
fellas2 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:57 PM.