logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Regional Forums > Northeast

Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, CT, RI, MA, PA, DE, WV, MD, NJ Remember, the Regional forums are for hunting topics only.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-11-2010, 03:05 PM   #101
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebird2 View Post
How do you like this pure speculation?

shall initiate earnest and aggressive strategic,
public advocacy, and political actions aimed at liberalizing hunting
regulations in ways that reduce the deer density on State Forests. Possible
strategic, public advocacy, and political actions include:

And where does it state anything about statewide herd reductions?It doesn't.The SCS is only concerned about the state forests and it even specifically states that.I rest my case.
DougE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 03:22 PM   #102
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Default

It is only appropriate to rest your case if you have a case to rest. The fact is that DMAP harvest rates average less than 2 DPSM and that is only for the specific area that is DMAPPED. That harvest rate wouldn't keep up with recruitment in any WMU, which means that if the herd in the entire WMU wasn't reduced DMAP harvest alone would be totally meaningless. Even with a 50% reduction in the herd in 2G, DMAP harvests are not enough to eliminate the need for exclosures. So the fact is you don't have a case to rest.
__________________
In Miss. ,ARs reduced the average rack size of 2.5+ buck across the entire state
bluebird2 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM.