logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Regional Forums > Northeast

Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, CT, RI, MA, PA, DE, WV, MD, NJ Remember, the Regional forums are for hunting topics only.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-04-2009, 12:08 PM   #1
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 522
Default Mohr needs to regroup

Since Steve Mohr (USPprez)is still insisting thatPGC and DCNR will be rolling in money fromMarcellus Shale gas money, guess this newswill not please him?

http://pittsburgh.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/stories/2009/01/19/story1.html?surround=etf&b=1232341200%5e176212 6
DennyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 12:14 PM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

Does that mean you are happy that the PGC will be potentially receiving less revenue?
__________________
In Miss. ,ARs reduced the average rack size of 2.5+ buck across the entire state
bluebird2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 12:28 PM   #3
Giant Nontypical
 
bawanajim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 8,133
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

Quote:
ORIGINAL: bluebird2

Does that mean you are happy that the PGC will be potentially receiving less revenue?
The unlikely welcome of a cash influx could possibly be offset by an increase of potential liability for cost overruns or unintentional waste watershed damage.Which clearly would be an unwelcome response to an other wise rapid dash for cash by anoperational break through in a forced funding dilemma.
__________________

# 3 on Metro's list !


Proud to hunt PA's Big bucks
bawanajim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 12:31 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

Quote:
The unlikely welcome of a cash influx could possibly be offset by an increase of potential liability for cost overruns or unintentional waste watershed damage
The PGC would have no liability for cost over runs and the gas companies would be liable for any damages due to potential pollution ,which would mean more revenue for the pGC and DCNR.
__________________
In Miss. ,ARs reduced the average rack size of 2.5+ buck across the entire state
bluebird2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 12:55 PM   #5
Giant Nontypical
 
bawanajim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 8,133
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

Substantial financial capital could be endangered by unintentional subterranean structural damage done by responsible people incapable ofmeasuring the tables of filtration done by aquiferial water tables.
This damage would would be irreversible and substantial monetary retribution would be required by all involved.
__________________

# 3 on Metro's list !


Proud to hunt PA's Big bucks
bawanajim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 12:59 PM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

Quote:
This damage would would be irreversible and substantial monetary retribution would be required by all involved.
Not if the contract was written properly. Who is going to sue the PGC for damage done to aquifers under SGLs?
__________________
In Miss. ,ARs reduced the average rack size of 2.5+ buck across the entire state
bluebird2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 01:13 PM   #7
Giant Nontypical
 
bawanajim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 8,133
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

The damagethough done in strategical location,is not limited to man made boundaries. Compete towns water systems could beimmediately affected with schools and hospitals being rendered useless.
Bonding in amounts needed to guarantee resources necessary to restore sanitary brine free aquiferial water systems not requiring reparations to end users is unavailable to serviceable industries in PA.
__________________

# 3 on Metro's list !


Proud to hunt PA's Big bucks
bawanajim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 01:25 PM   #8
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

So are you saying the companies wasted all that money buying up the rights to drill?
__________________
In Miss. ,ARs reduced the average rack size of 2.5+ buck across the entire state
bluebird2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 01:32 PM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
White-tail-deer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southeast PA
Posts: 1,440
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

Wow those are some big words there bawanajim.
White-tail-deer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 01:37 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
Default RE: Mohr needs to regroup

He he he. I was thinking the same. Ive never heard --Losing money due to polluting ground water-- put so eloquently! (LOL)
Cornelius08 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Happy "B" Day Paul L Mohr Rebel Hog Whitetail Deer Hunting 4 08-19-2007 12:39 PM
pressure the PGC to appoint Mohr ulysses Northeast 13 01-01-2005 05:31 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:06 AM.