logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Regional Forums > Northeast

Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, CT, RI, MA, PA, DE, WV, MD, NJ Remember, the Regional forums are for hunting topics only.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2005, 09:21 AM   #1
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 248
Default Rather than quality deer management

I'd like to see QUANTITY deer management. I could really care less about antlers or bagging a buck that scores a lot of B&C points. I just want venison in my freezer. I'd be just as happy to shoot a smallish doe (if it were legal) as I would a 200+ lb 14 point monster.

Does anyone else have a similar mentality, or am I alone in my meat hunting ways?

Don't get me wrong, I have absolutely no problem with people who are after a nice rack. I would just prefer a high chance of getting any deer to a slight chance of getting a trophy deer.
VT_Hunter1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 09:27 AM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
rybohunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,211
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

The 2 things are not mutually exclusive. MANY areas have lots of deer,as well asgood numbers of big bucks. The biggeest factor in determining the quantity of deer is habitat. Lots of deer need lots of food. Not all places can support that.
__________________
Just a regular guy who likes to hunt

http://www.camospace.com/rybo
rybohunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 09:35 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 248
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

We have plenty of carrying capacity left in Vermont. Of course the winters are probably a huge limiting factor.
VT_Hunter1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 09:49 AM   #4
jf5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Allston MA USA
Posts: 533
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

Quote:
ORIGINAL: VT_Hunter1980

I'd like to see QUANTITY deer management. I could really care less about antlers or bagging a buck that scores a lot of B&C points. I just want venison in my freezer. I'd be just as happy to shoot a smallish doe (if it were legal) as I would a 200+ lb 14 point monster.

Does anyone else have a similar mentality, or am I alone in my meat hunting ways?

Don't get me wrong, I have absolutely no problem with people who are after a nice rack. I would just prefer a high chance of getting any deer to a slight chance of getting a trophy deer.
I understand what you mean. And QTY vs Quality is a personal choice.

But I don't know any deer hunter just as happy to shoot a smal doe as they would a 14 point buck
jf5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 10:01 AM   #5
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 248
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

Quote:
ORIGINAL: jf5

Quote:
ORIGINAL: VT_Hunter1980

I'd like to see QUANTITY deer management. I could really care less about antlers or bagging a buck that scores a lot of B&C points. I just want venison in my freezer. I'd be just as happy to shoot a smallish doe (if it were legal) as I would a 200+ lb 14 point monster.

Does anyone else have a similar mentality, or am I alone in my meat hunting ways?

Don't get me wrong, I have absolutely no problem with people who are after a nice rack. I would just prefer a high chance of getting any deer to a slight chance of getting a trophy deer.
I understand what you mean. And QTY vs Quality is a personal choice.

But I don't know any deer hunter just as happy to shoot a smal doe as they would a 14 point buck
Actually, the best tasting venison I've ever had was from a very small doe taken during bow season. It was like free range veal.
VT_Hunter1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 10:17 AM   #6
jf5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Allston MA USA
Posts: 533
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

Quote:
ORIGINAL: VT_Hunter1980

Quote:
ORIGINAL: jf5

Quote:
ORIGINAL: VT_Hunter1980

I'd like to see QUANTITY deer management. I could really care less about antlers or bagging a buck that scores a lot of B&C points. I just want venison in my freezer. I'd be just as happy to shoot a smallish doe (if it were legal) as I would a 200+ lb 14 point monster.

Does anyone else have a similar mentality, or am I alone in my meat hunting ways?

Don't get me wrong, I have absolutely no problem with people who are after a nice rack. I would just prefer a high chance of getting any deer to a slight chance of getting a trophy deer.
I understand what you mean. And QTY vs Quality is a personal choice.

But I don't know any deer hunter just as happy to shoot a smal doe as they would a 14 point buck
Actually, the best tasting venison I've ever had was from a very small doe taken during bow season. It was like free range veal.
I agree 100% that a small doe eats better than an old buck any day. I have taken my share of "vealison". I still would rather shoot a big buck, or better yet, one each. LOL
jf5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 10:32 AM   #7
Giant Nontypical
 
rybohunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,211
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

Quote:
Of course the winters are probably a huge limiting factor.

Then you don't have a huge carrying capacity.
__________________
Just a regular guy who likes to hunt

http://www.camospace.com/rybo
rybohunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 10:41 AM   #8
jf5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Allston MA USA
Posts: 533
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

Quote:
ORIGINAL: rybohunter

Quote:
Of course the winters are probably a huge limiting factor.

Then you don't have a huge carrying capacity.
Unfortunatly, that is the case. VT managed its deer herd for quantity for decades and it did not work out well in the long run.
jf5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 11:03 AM   #9
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 248
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

Quote:
ORIGINAL: rybohunter

Quote:
Of course the winters are probably a huge limiting factor.

Then you don't have a huge carrying capacity.
Then why is it that places like Minnesota and the northern penisula of Michigan also have tough winters, but much better deer herds?

Apparently, it wasn't always this way in Vermont. My father, and most other old timers, tell me stories of seeing up to 20 deer in a day of hunting. I usually see a doe or two every other season. What happened to result in such a downward spiral?

I know Vermont will never have the seemingly limitless amount of deer that places like PA and TX seem to have, but we can certainly accomodate a lot more deer than we have now.
VT_Hunter1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 11:12 AM   #10
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Posts: 689
Default RE: Rather than quality deer management

I eat large amounts of deer meat, practicly live on the stuff so quantity is important to me. With that said I still try to shoot big bucks, I let most of the small bucks walk and shoot a lot of does. I usually take5+ does a year and 1 or 2 bucks. Living in MD we have plenty of quantity, quality you have to work for a little bit.
Lefty26 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quality Deer Management penninside08 Trail Cameras 6 03-17-2009 06:08 AM
Quality Deer Management (QDM) wahoohunter Wildlife Management / Food Plots 13 11-17-2007 06:41 PM
quality deer management? kansaswiderack Bowhunting 23 03-09-2004 10:10 PM
poll on quality deer management thelastboyscout Bowhunting 29 12-18-2003 12:31 PM
Quality Deer Management Remy 15 Bowhunting 2 10-30-2002 06:30 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 PM.