BURRIS OR LEUPOLD?

[schunter270]

I'm getting ready to purchase a scope to go on my RSRH. I've been looking at a Burris 2-7x32mm and a Leupold 2.5-8x32mm in the cabelas catalog and can't decide which to get. Any suggestions on which is the better scope or any other recommendations?

[justhrowit]

Not sure about either one, but....I've heard leupolds customer service is second to none. I've heard of them replacing scopes/binos even when they are a few years old. Even on minor problems. FYI

Jay

[VAhuntr]

I prefer Leupold.

[Deleted User]

[Deleted by Admins]

[liquidorange]

LEUPOLD-LEUPOLD-LEUPOLD then you wont have to buy again BURRIS[:'(] ive had to deal with them and it was not fun or funny[:@]

[trailer]

I"™m not familiar with with Burris scopes so I would lean more towards Leupold because the have excellent customer service if need be.

[m.t.hands]

i've only owned one burris scope, and i currently have several leupold scopes, this is one case i believe you get what you pay for.

[oldelkhunter]

YOu must be talking about the 2.5-8x36 VXIII scope. I would go with Leupold as their Customer SErvice is well worth it. The scope optically is a better scope then the Burris as well. If you don't want to spend that much money look at a VX-II 2-7 they have the same lenses as the Vari-x III model and should rate in the low 90's as far as light transmittal.

[WA7MM]

Leupold! I have several and never let me down....Not familiar with burris and I haven't heard anything good or bad about them.

[Ruger-Redhawk]

Leupold all the way.Leopold has a nice M8 ERR2x 20mm scope for around 220.00 in the Silver finish.I have it mounted on a new Ruger SBH Hunter. It's still unfired so I can't tell of it performance. I like the Leupolds.I'm sure this one will be like all the others I have First Class. I was going to buy the 4 x but was advised by many to go with the 2x instead for whatever that's worth.

Ruger Redhawk