logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2005, 02:00 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location:
Posts: 138
Default 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

I have a Weatherby MK V in 7 MM REM MAG. I have a line a 300 Weatherby which I am interested in at a good price. Are these calibers too similar to notice a difference? I would like to use the 300 Weatherby on big bears.
rrules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 02:44 PM   #2
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,470
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

The weatherby will shoot flatter and deliver a heavier bullet at extended distances. It will definitely recoil more then the 7 Rem mag
__________________
"Banning guns is an idea whose time has come."

- Joseph Biden

Associated Press 11/18/93



"Be thankful that we're not getting all the government we are paying for." Will Rogers
oldelkhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 03:30 PM   #3
Typical Buck
 
dvdegeorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WNY USA
Posts: 900
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

Cost of ammo is a consideration if you don't reload. 300 weatherby ammo is big $$$$
__________________
It's not an obsession...it's a way of life
dvdegeorge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 03:40 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bradford, Ontario
Posts: 2,195
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

Quote:
I would like to use the 300 Weatherby on big bears.
If by BIG BEARS you are talking brown and grizz then I would jump up to a .338 win mag which will recoil about the same as a .300 WBY but deliver a 250 gr. slug. Much better for hunting bears. Great round for moose also, I have killed quite a few with it.
__________________
I don't like people who don't like dogs !
TerryM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 03:52 PM   #5
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Goucester Maine
Posts: 263
Send a message via AIM to redsox3624
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

if you like your 7mm and you want big bears i agree you should go with the .338 winchester magnum.
redsox3624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 10:00 PM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,418
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

The .300 Wby. Mag. Is a greater preformer than the 7mm Rem. Mag., and yes, people use the .300 Wby. Mag. for hunting the great bears. Good luck.
__________________
PROUD HUNTERS KILL THEIR GAME THEY DON'T HARVRST THEM!!
handloader1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 10:06 PM   #7
Typical Buck
 
ELKINMTCWB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 833
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

I am a 300 fan there is a big dif in 7mm and the 300 wb the down range energy is the dif.338 is all so a good gun
ELKINMTCWB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 10:08 PM   #8
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,673
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

If big bears are on the menu ,I prefer the .338" bullets.
stubblejumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 10:23 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,052
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

As much as I love the 338 as THE classic all around 1 gun for the North American continent, I must confess my love for the original "super 30" the 300 WbyMag. From a handloaders table you cant convince me that a 200grain Xbullet fired stoutly from a 300Wby wont do anything a 338 with a 250 will do, you just cant convince me.

If price is no matter, then go for it. With the cost of todays premium standard mag ammunition (Fed Prem/Vital Shok, Win Sup, Hornady etc) vs the cost of Weatherby ammo for the 300 and below, there isnt that much difference anymore.

A full boat 300Wby from a throated gun is MUCH more gun than the 7Rem ever thought about being. Theres just no comparison. Sure the Wby whomps on you more, but be a man and take it. Gonna shoot BIG guns you need to act like a BIG boy!

One thing about the 338 vs the 300Wby, EITHER will be a fine gun. Personally if I were picking a BIG bear gun it would be a .375 H&H for work under 300yds and a .378 Wby for longer shots. But seldom will you shoot a BIG bear that far. Its just to dangerous and many guides wont let you do it. THEY are the ones who have to wade in and sort the pieces out if he doesnt fall at the shot. You can NEVER kill a pissed grizzley (and they ALL become that way as soon as you put a hole in them) too dead!!!

Good luck,
RA
RedAllison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 10:49 PM   #10
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,673
Default RE: 300 Weatherby vs 7 mm REM MAG

Of course if you really want to stay with the .308" bullets the 300ultramag offers slightly more punch than the 300wby.With .338" bullets the 338ultramag offers noticeably more punch than the 338winmag and offers flatter trajectory as well for longer ranges.
stubblejumper is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would A Weatherby be A Weatherby With A Detachable Magazine?? ox1443 Guns 17 08-25-2011 10:08 AM
African Special!! Weatherby markV .416 Weatherby mag. NYBigbucks Guns 1 01-26-2009 05:53 PM
Weatherby Vanguard 300 Weatherby Magnum RugerM77.270 Guns 14 09-08-2008 11:04 AM
Weatherby Mark V Deluxe - 7mm Weatherby Magnum 300winnie Guns 1 06-25-2007 10:24 AM
Weatherby Mark V Deluxe - .300 Weatherby Magnum 300winnie Guns 4 12-05-2006 09:27 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 AM.