logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Land for Sale - click here!
View Poll Results: A poll
Bushnell 203 14.41%
Leupold 572 40.60%
Simmons 84 5.96%
Tasco 45 3.19%
Zeiss 118 8.37%
Swaroski 73 5.18%
Redfield 30 2.13%
Weaver 26 1.85%
other 258 18.31%
Voters: 1409. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-13-2009, 05:53 AM   #251
Fork Horn
 
cooper_m22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: from Kentucky now live in Montana
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thndrchiken View Post
I have Bushnell Elites, Nikon Buckmasters, Leupolds and one Zeiss. If I had to replace one I'd be buying another Conquest.
I 2nd that. Zeiss Conquest all the way.
cooper_m22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 05:48 PM   #252
Typical Buck
 
13pointjomc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NE Alabama
Posts: 738
Default

Leupold Rifleman 3x9x40 on my 243.
__________________
PeopleEatingTastyAnimals
13pointjomc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 02:09 PM   #253
Fork Horn
 
bush_pig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Molong,NSW Australia
Posts: 112
Default

I like Swaroski just because of how clear it is but I don't have the money to buy one but when I do I will buy one.
__________________
cats n 458 Accrels what a great combinations
bush_pig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 04:58 PM   #254
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location:
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KBM View Post
I switched from Leupold to Nikon about 4 years ago. I love this scope! I think right now it's the best scope on the market.

Nikon Monarch 2.5-10X42 BDC or 3-12x42 BDC



I agree!!! I personally think Nikon is where its at...for the money! I mean are Zeiss and Swarvoski better....probably....but when I can buy 2-3...maybe even 4 Nikons for the price of a Swavoski...I mean come on. I'm not rich and I don't have anything against those who can afford a Swarvoski....I'll definitely have one if I win the lottery LOL!! I have a Nikon Omega on my TC Triumph and plan on getting a Nikon Monarch 2.5-10X42 for my Browning in the very near future.----Dr ASUS
__________________
I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6!
DrAsus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 07:22 PM   #255
Spike
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
Default

I just got a swift and I'm very pleased.
paterlog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 10:17 PM   #256
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 112
Default

Fixed 4X leupold or weaver K4
will79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 07:09 AM   #257
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Warren County NJ USA
Posts: 2,303
Default

dollar for dollar you can't beat the Leupolds, I have the VX-II 3-9x40 on all but one firearm I own
__________________
Mathews Z7, Quad Ultra Pro Rest, HHA OL-5500 Sight,
Carbon Express Maxima 250 Arrows, Muzzy 3 Blade 100gr. Broadheads,
T/C Triumph, Leupold VX-II 3-9X40,
H&R Ultra 20ga, Leupold VX-II 3-9X40, Hornady SST
Mossberg 835 Turkey Shotgun
BOWHUNTERCOP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 03:27 AM   #258
Spike
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 22
Default

I disagree with the comment about leupold being best deal for the money. I did a little research on entry level scopes for a guy($200 range) and came up with these specs. these are all 3x9x40

Burris Fullfield II
eye relief-3.1"-3.8"
light transmission- 95%
MOA adjustments- 1/4" @100 yards max adjustment 50
actual maximum magnification- 9x
lifetime warranty
manufactured in both the USA and Philipines(depends on demand)

Nikon Buckmaster
eye relief- 3.6"
light transmission- 92%
MOA adjustments- 1/4" @100 yards max adjustment 80
actual maximum magnification- 9x
lifetime warranty
manufatured somewhere in asia

Leupold rifleman
eye relief- 3.7"
light transmission- 82%
MOA adjustments- 1/2"@100yards max adjustment 56 elevation 52 windage
lifetime warranty
manufactured in USA

The way I see it the Leupold doesnt even fit into the same class even though it costs the same amount. The only reason i can think of is the whole made in USA thing but IMO that is crap. I am pretty sure thats why GM and Chrysler just had to take a bail out from government and are still on a pretty slippery slope. It just doesnt make sense to me an inferior product for the same price its just stupid.
brasmunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 10:05 PM   #259
Spike
 
warbirdlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: southeastern Wisconsin
Posts: 58
Default

I just replaced my original Nikon 3-9 X 40 with a Mueller 4-16 X 50 AO. It appears to be a nice scope. Time will tell.....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg gun2.jpg (94.5 KB, 7 views)
__________________
WBL
warbirdlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 03:56 PM   #260
Nontypical Buck
 
Sheridan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,019
Default

Notice the second hightest rated is "other" !?!?
__________________
Brown Dirt Cowboy
Stand up and be counted
Sheridan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTT Nikon Pro Staff Scope & Simmons Pro Diamond Scope Indiana SmokePole Muzzleloading Guns 0 04-13-2008 09:58 PM
to scope or not to scope 336A semi Guns 19 12-01-2007 06:57 AM
Old Ruger Scope Mounts/Scope OldFart Black Powder 0 11-30-2006 02:11 PM
Scope ring height for 700 50mm scope kpk10.20.84 Guns 6 02-18-2006 10:33 PM
Mauser 3-9x scope--what can someone tell me about this scope??? newhunter35 Guns 1 01-25-2005 05:17 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 AM.