logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-27-2004, 10:13 AM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,387
Default 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

Looking for a new magnum to put in the safe. I am having trouble making the final choice. These are all "mid-bore" magnums if you will. Just looking for a good preformer on the lighter side of the "Big-bores", something smaller than a 416-Rigby.
The intended use of this rifle is Elk, Moose & Black bears. I already know I do not need a rifle this large to hunt these critters with.
If it helps the largest magnum I have in my safe is a 300-Winchester magnum. Just looking to step up.[8D]

I am leaning towards the 375-RUM.?
Wolf killer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 10:49 AM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
Carpmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere in Michigan
Posts: 5,706
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

I personnaly would lean more towards the 338 bullet size guns. Good luck with it!
__________________
Vote Republican, Save our rights!!!
Carpmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 10:57 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 547
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

Either the 338 or the 340 would be a great choice if you had to shoot longer ranges. They fly pretty flat for a big dia bullet. Their power is not much less than that of the 375rum. All they would be good choices for heavy or dangerous game. Bullet choice are leaning towards the 338. Only using it for close shots I think the 375 would have that extra thump.
__________________
Take a youth hunting and preserve the future.
cherokee_outfitters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 02:09 PM   #4
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 175
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

I think the 338 RUM is cheaper to buy factory loads for. 340 W are hard to find bullets. Either gun would work well. I just had a break put on the 340 and it hits alittle less now.
marty1028 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 04:11 PM   #5
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

338RUM and above thumps pretty good. I can't say I would go past that for anything in North America.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 11:39 PM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baileysville, WV
Posts: 2,929
Send a message via AIM to Doe Dumper Send a message via Yahoo to Doe Dumper
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

LMAO! Just how big a building do ya plan to kill?? J/K
__________________
Right Wing Extremist !!!
Doe Dumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2004, 07:18 AM   #7
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 395
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

Go with the 338 RUM.
I love mine. It has over 4600 pounds of energy out of the muz. , and still has over 2000 pounds of energy at 500 yards.



Good luck!!
Leroy
hunter338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2004, 10:41 AM   #8
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 162
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

I am a huge fan of the 340 wby. I've shot a number of different mark V varietys and all were 1/2" to 3/4" shooters with factory ammo. Weatherby ammo is unusual in my experience in that it nearly always chronographs at advertised velocities. While the 338RUM clearly has case capacity advantage, in factory ammo, the loads I have seen chronographed were within 50 fps of weatherby factory ammo--not much of a difference. If weatherby rifles fit you well, I would strongly encourage you consider that route. I too have contemplated adding a 375RUM to the safe. The problem I have is here in North America, I don't know what it could do that a 340 with 250grain bullets at nearly 3000fps couldn't do better. While it does have the ability to shoot commonly available heavier bullets, I thing the greater sectional density of the 250 grain .338 bullets at higher velocity will always out pentetrate the 375RUM while doing so with a much flatter trajectory. In addition, 210 partitions at 3250 fps make one hell of a long range elk/moose/caribou and black bear load--they've also worked suberbly on anterlope and whitetails (although clearly overkill). I've come to the personal conclusion that the 340wby may be the perfect all around rifle for North American big game.
elkaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2004, 09:48 PM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,418
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

.340 Wby. Mag. Good luck.
__________________
PROUD HUNTERS KILL THEIR GAME THEY DON'T HARVRST THEM!!
handloader1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 04:16 AM   #10
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OKC Ok. USA
Posts: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Ruddyduck
Default RE: 338-RUM 340-Wby or 375-RUM???

If you're looking for something more than a 300 mag class, go for the old standy by the 375H&H and if you want a 40 go to the 404 jefferies or 458win mag.
All of the above, to me at least ,are pleasant to shoot as far as magnums go. I can't say about the RUM's but I've shot 338's ,340Wthby,416 Rem and 460 wthby and found the older rounds nicer to shoot.
Ruddyduck is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 PM.