logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2003, 02:33 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan
Posts: 69
Default Scopes

Im looking a good scope for my 270 and don't really know what to get. I heard that Leupold Vari-x 2 is good but was wondering on Bushnell Elite 4200 w/ firefly or weaver grand slam. Also I am going to use it strictly for whitetail and muleys so what power should I get (3x9x40)??. I'm from Saskatchewan Canada and hunt in very open area's. Thanks
__________________
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Norco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2003, 03:38 PM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
PaJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: N-E PA.
Posts: 1,698
Send a message via Yahoo to PaJack
Default RE: Scopes

I would put a 3X9 Leupold or a Zeiss on top if it were me...
__________________
Hunt Safe!

Jack
PaJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2003, 04:31 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
Ruger-Redhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,877
Default RE: Scopes

Welcome to the forum Norco.A Leupold would be a good choice.Of course if you have the money to spend the Zeiss be another good choice. Look at the Nikon's and the higher end Bushnells.I have a Weaver V24 and so far it's been a decent scope. Then again I haven't used it much.On the higher powers it's not the clearest I've ever seen.If you buy a quality scope you'll be head of the game instead of buying a low end scope. Not sure what you guys can get way up there.You maybe limited to your selection.
Ruger Redhawk
__________________
**** NRA Patron Life Member ****

Ruger Redhawk
Ruger-Redhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2003, 04:38 PM   #4
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,606
Default RE: Scopes

The 4200 is an excelent scope and come with better features than the Leupolds do. Between these two and most others Bushnell would be getting my money. Everyone always talks about Leupolds warranty but Bushnell has the same lifetime warranty on their products also.

The 4200 has fully multicoated optics on all optic surfaces and the Leupold VX-II is multicoated on the exterior lense surfaces. The 4200 also uses a alluminum/ titanium one piece tube to give it more strength and lighter weight than standard alluminum tubes.

For magnification the 3-9X or the 4-12X in the Leupold or the 2.5-10X or the 4-16X in the 4200 would be my choice if you are truely hunting in open territory. I would most likley go for the 4200 in 2.5-10X. That would provide plenty of magnification for big game animals farther than you will probably be shooting.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
bigbulls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2003, 04:42 PM   #5
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,673
Default RE: Scopes

In that pricerange the 4200 would be my choice.It is brighter than the vxii and the rainguard is an added feature.I would get the 2.5x10x40.
stubblejumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2003, 09:39 PM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,882
Default RE: Scopes

I agree go with the 4200 2.5x10x40 but lose the firefly..I see no benefits to having to charge reticle by way of a flashlight. I have 2 - 4200's and they are excellent scopes for the money, as you can see I live and hunt the same area (sask). Leupold do make a good product but the VX II IMO is over priced here in Canada for what you get, it only makes the 4200 and even the 3200 elite a better bang for your buck.
skeeter 7MM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2003, 11:39 PM   #7
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,476
Default RE: Scopes

All of the ones you mentioned are very good scopes. The 4200 is hard to beat.
__________________
Freedom. Use it or loose it.
James B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2003, 07:30 AM   #8
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Harrietta michigan USA
Posts: 116
Default RE: Scopes

I agree, I would lose the Firefly reticle. Personally if I had to choose, I would go with a Nikon Monarch first, than a Weaver Grand Slam followed by the Bushnell Elite 4200. All 3 of these scopes are very close in quality and are much better than the Leupold VX-II's.

Jon Jackoviak
The Optic Zone
www.theopticzone.com
info@theopticzone.com
theoutdoorwizard is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Red Dot Scopes SHED HUNTER 365 Guns 4 05-22-2008 12:56 PM
ML scopes VS. rifle scopes? TXFRNTLDER Black Powder 14 01-13-2007 01:21 PM
Sightron Scopes?/ Scopes in General? bloodtrail455 Black Powder 16 12-31-2005 09:49 PM
Scopes... Treebranch86 Guns 2 12-12-2005 11:06 PM
Red-Dot Scopes Boone14622 Bowhunting 5 03-23-2004 06:42 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:09 AM.