logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-25-2003, 06:08 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: louisburg n.c. USA
Posts: 90
Default Short magnums

Which out of the three .270 , .300 , 7mm short mags performs the best?
rustydale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 06:30 PM   #2
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,606
Default RE: Short magnums

That' s a pretty broad question. Tell us what you plan on hunting, where you plan on hunting, what the terrain is like, so on and so on.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
bigbulls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 08:17 PM   #3
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,476
Default RE: Short magnums

If you are talking all short Mags. My pick would be the 270wsm. The 7MM and 270 versions would serve pretty much the same tasks with pretty equal performance. The 300 of course would give you more bullet weight range and more ME. One down side I have heard about the 7MM SM is that you must seat the bullets pretty deep and therefore loose powder space. The 270 SM kind of fills a nich that only the 270 Weatherby Mag fills. They are hard to find and expesive to buy and shoot. You would also be well served by the 270 Winchester. I don' t know what you plan to hunt. The mags are really not my cup of tea.
__________________
Freedom. Use it or loose it.
James B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 08:24 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MISSOURI
Posts: 1,158
Default RE: Short magnums

I HAVE A 270WSM AND I LOVE IT BUT THE REAL QUESTION IS WHAT YOU PLAN ON HUNTING . I DO AGREE THAT THE 270 WILL DO ANYTHING THAT THE 7MM WILL DO . UNLESS YOU RELOAD YOUR OWN.
DANTHEHUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 08:44 PM   #5
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 897
Default RE: Short magnums

If you are hunting North American big game, the .270 WSM is all you will ever need. It is perfect for all of our hooved game animals (African plains game, too).

Some people might say that it isn' t enough for the big bears...and I would agree. However, neither is a .300 WSM, so save your shoulder and hunt deer, pronghorn, caribou, sheep, goats, elk and/or moose with the .270 WSM.
__________________
Good Dogwork and Good Hunting
seattlesetters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 09:55 PM   #6
Fork Horn
 
GordonGekko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jackson MS USA
Posts: 387
Default RE: Short magnums

What kind of performance are you looking for, i.e. what do you want to do with it? For deer and other medium game I like the 270. For Elk I like the 300 WSM, although I' m not very recoil sensitive and don' t believe that you can be " overgunned" . I chose the 300 because it fit well in my hunting needs, one of the others might be better for you.

Gordon
__________________
In God we trust...all others pay cash!

www.louisianaduckcalls.com
GordonGekko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2003, 04:46 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: louisburg n.c. USA
Posts: 90
Default RE: Short magnums

I live in NC. and hunt whitetail, I know the regular' s like the .308, 30-06, and the .270 are just fine but just courious on the new short mag' s.
rustydale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2003, 06:43 AM   #8
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MISSOURI
Posts: 1,158
Default RE: Short magnums

RUSTY THE 7MM AND THE 300 ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE LONG ACTION BUT THE 270 HAS ENOUGH DIFFENCE THAT ITS WORTH LOOKING AT. YOU HAVE TO KNOW THAT THE FACTORY WILL INFLATE THEIR FIGURES BUT THERE IS SOME EXTRA PUNCH .MINE IS A BROWNING ABOLT AND IT SHOOTS VERY ACCURATE, I SHOOT 150 GR SUPER X WIN. AFTER I HAD MINE FOR 1 MONTH 3 OTHERS IN MY FAMILY PURCHASED ONE.
DANTHEHUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2003, 03:56 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location:
Posts: 381
Send a message via AIM to BuckSlayer101
Default RE: Short magnums

270
__________________
member of the new PETA= people eating tasty animals

Screw the old PETA!
BuckSlayer101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2003, 09:01 PM   #10
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,673
Default RE: Short magnums

I always have preferred the 7mm bore over any 270 for larger game.
stubblejumper is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
7 mm Magnums vs the 300 Magnums biscuit jake Guns 7 03-12-2006 07:34 PM
Most popular of the new Short Magnums? nyorange Guns 16 04-10-2005 09:32 PM
Short draw with a short brace height? DeerT Technical 9 10-22-2003 11:19 AM
Short magnums bentbarrel Guns 16 05-13-2003 03:08 PM
short magnums rochelle Guns 3 01-12-2003 01:28 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:58 PM.