Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
New to hunting >

New to hunting

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

New to hunting

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-02-2017, 04:55 PM
  #11  
Super Moderator
 
CalHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 18,381
Default

I say get both.
CalHunter is offline  
Old 01-02-2017, 05:25 PM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Rob in VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central VT/Big Horn WY
Posts: 1,543
Default

Either is a great choice for elk and deer. I prefer a 30 cal like the 30-06, but that's just my personal preference.

Good luck in ID. Shoot some wolves.
Rob in VT is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 01:47 PM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default

270, or split the difference, 280 rem or 280 Rem. Ackley Improved.
salukipv1 is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 04:48 PM
  #14  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
Default

Originally Posted by salukipv1
270, or split the difference, 280 rem or 280 Rem. Ackley Improved.
I can't go with your AI suggestion since he's not a reloader. He needs to go with a common caliber and the 06 and .270 are as good as it gets for what he wants and with easily to be found ammo just about anywhere in either one.
Topgun 3006 is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 05:07 PM
  #15  
Giant Nontypical
 
jeepkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 5,052
Default

Originally Posted by Topgun 3006
I can't go with your AI suggestion since he's not a reloader. He needs to go with a common caliber and the 06 and .270 are as good as it gets for what he wants and with easily to be found ammo just about anywhere in either one.
280 Ack is now a SAAMI cartridge so factory ammo is available. Not as plentiful as .270 or 30/06 but it's out there.
jeepkid is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 05:20 PM
  #16  
Nontypical Buck
 
super_hunt54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,695
Default

"Out there" in more ways than one!! Poor guy would go broke learning how to shoot! The few that even produce the cartridge are charging anywhere from $3.00-$5.00 a round!! Definitely not a round I would suggest to anyone that doesn't reload.
super_hunt54 is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 05:45 PM
  #17  
Spike
 
Sage of the Sage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 33
Default

Aaron, I may catch some static over this, but for your first big game rifle you're definitely on the right track considering a .270 or 30-06 (and don't forget the .308) - don't let somebody talk you into a magnum.
Sage of the Sage is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 05:49 PM
  #18  
Giant Nontypical
 
jeepkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 5,052
Default

Originally Posted by super_hunt54
"Out there" in more ways than one!! Poor guy would go broke learning how to shoot! The few that even produce the cartridge are charging anywhere from $3.00-$5.00 a round!! Definitely not a round I would suggest to anyone that doesn't reload.
Averages about $2.80 a round...half the price of a Weatherby or Lazzeroni lol
jeepkid is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 07:38 PM
  #19  
Nontypical Buck
 
Nomercy448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,902
Default

Originally Posted by Oldtimr
Super, I don't have to close my eyes to tell if a rifle is uncomfortable or doesn't fit me correctly when I throw it up. Since you don't aim a shotgun you point it, it is more important for it to come to line of sight than a rifle. It is important if the rifle stock is too long or too short but it doesn't matter all that much if the front sight isn't exactly on target when you throw it up to your shoulder because you are going to settle in and aim it.
I don't agree with this at all. While the sight might not need to be on target when the rifle is raised, the front and rear sights damned well better be in alignment, else you'll never shoot it as well nor acquire your sights as quickly as you could. Proper comb height and stock cast do matter in rifles, as much as they do in shotguns. Guys just tend to be apathetic because they have a rear sight as a reference and they neglect their right to refuse a stock which forces them to sacrifice their cheek weld to align the sights.
Nomercy448 is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 07:55 PM
  #20  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: between azle and Boyd
Posts: 198
Default

True 30-06 may pack a lil more punch but I prefer the flatter shooting 270 .the little size you give up makes less drop improving accuracy allowing you to hit the right spot ,and the 270 is big enough to do the job without as much damage. Also lighter in the field . Enjoy your choice, they are both good and should bring you good memories.
blessed n born to hunt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.