logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2012, 06:23 AM   #1
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 603
Default Opinions on heavy bore AR's?

I'm considering a .458, .450, or .50B AR upper for deer and hogs. Leaning towards the .450 bushy.

What's your take on heavy bore AR's for big game hunting? I'm leaning towards the .450 Bushy mostly for the MV/energy, but I'm open to hear opinions on other heavy bores. Maybe there's some political or other consideration that I've overlooked?

Sometimes I worry that I have split-personality disorder, because there's part of me that is giddy over a bullets with BC's over .45 running over 3300fps, but then there's the other side of me that loves a big fat pumpkin trucking along south of Mach 2.

I was planning to rebarrel my 6.8 to a grendel, now that things are ironed out with the licensing, but have since decided to go with a .243WSSM, and will be buying a DTI receiver, so my CURRENT 6.8 receiver needs a job...

Which is where the .450 bushy comes in. It MAY defeat the purpose of the AR platform, since both the .450 and the .243 are 5 shot propositions, but at least they'll be comfortable and fast firing.
Nomercy448 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 10:16 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Sheridan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,927
Default

I like the 6.8 SPC, ever since I saw this rig;


http://www.barrett.net/firearms/rec7
__________________
Silence is Acceptance. "To stand in silence when they should be protesting makes cowards out of men." ~ Abraham Lincoln ~ Stand Up and Be Counted !
Sheridan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 12:05 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
halfbakedi420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,361
Send a message via Yahoo to halfbakedi420
Default

http://www.barrett.net/firearms/rec7
this in 6.8..eff an ar
__________________
_ _ _Death Comes Out the End of This Thing _ _ _



ĦÅĹFBĂĶĔЙ
halfbakedi420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 12:30 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 4,580
Default

I have a 458 socom, an awesome shortrange deer stopper



a .458 dia 300 gr bullet at 2200 fps will ruin about anythings day
RR
__________________
Born To Hunt, Forced To Work.
Ridge Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 12:51 PM   #5
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 463
Default

I would get the 458 SOCOM over the 450. The 450 shoots pistol bullets while the 458 SOCOM shoots rifle bullets.
__________________
White Super 91 .504/.451
2 White Lightnings .504
White M2000 Blacktail Hunter .504
Nimrodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 12:52 PM   #6
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 463
Default

Ridge Runner are you shooting Barnes bullets?
__________________
White Super 91 .504/.451
2 White Lightnings .504
White M2000 Blacktail Hunter .504
Nimrodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 12:55 PM   #7
Nontypical Buck
 
halfbakedi420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,361
Send a message via Yahoo to halfbakedi420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nimrodder View Post
I would get the 458 SOCOM over the 450. The 450 shoots pistol bullets while the 458 SOCOM shoots rifle bullets.
arnt these sub-sonic?
__________________
_ _ _Death Comes Out the End of This Thing _ _ _



ĦÅĹFBĂĶĔЙ
halfbakedi420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 12:57 PM   #8
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 603
Default

Ridge, is your EP enlarged? It might just be my eyes, since I'm a fan of dust covers and not as used to the naked look. The mill job on the ejection port is why I decided to go ahead and buy a DTI receiver for my .243WSSM build (HAS to be ported), so I'm looking for a cartridge that will fit out the standard port.

(I haven't ever heard that it was necessary to open the port to convert to any of the big bore AR platform rounds, so I'm guessing it's just my lack of familiarity with the profiled receiver).
Nomercy448 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 01:10 PM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 4,580
Default

Quote:
Ridge Runner are you shooting Barnes bullets?
no but the 300 gr barnes original is on my list to test next
Quote:
arnt these sub-sonic?
the 458 socom was designed by marty weems, as a subsonic close quarters battle rifle, however it was discovered that loaded up to full power it is the ballistic twin to a mid level loaded 45-70
Quote:
Ridge, is your EP enlarged? It might just be my eyes, since I'm a fan of dust covers and not as used to the naked look. The mill job on the ejection port is why I decided to go ahead and buy a DTI receiver for my .243WSSM build (HAS to be ported), so I'm looking for a cartridge that will fit out the standard port.

(I haven't ever heard that it was necessary to open the port to convert to any of the big bore AR platform rounds, so I'm guessing it's just my lack of familiarity with the profiled receiver).
no its not my upper is on a dpms slabside upper reciever so it just doesn't have a dust cover or foreward assist, my 458 EP is the same size as my 223's and smaller than my 25 wssm.
all you need different is a barrel and a .473 bolt. and like a previous post said you get to choose from the .458 bullets over the .452's with the bushy.
RR
__________________
Born To Hunt, Forced To Work.
Ridge Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 01:24 PM   #10
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 603
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nimrodder View Post
I would get the 458 SOCOM over the 450. The 450 shoots pistol bullets while the 458 SOCOM shoots rifle bullets.
I have been pondering this a bit. It surprises me that the .458 Socom (the slower of the two) is the one that runs rifle bullets. On the other hand, neither are running very fast. I'd like the extra 10% MV/20% KE of the .450 over the .458, but I do appreciate the difference in bullet construction. I'm not really certain that 2100-2200fps is too fast for pistol bullets though? (Thinking back over the last 20yrs pushing 240grn "pistol" bullets out of a Marlin 1894 to 1900-1950fps for deer). Having ran .45-70's for deer, I've seen my share of bullets that were clearly moving too slow to properly expand (rifle bullets).

So the bullet choice IS indeed something that does keep me up at night. Ultimately, I'd like something that would be a modest improvement over a .45-70 for trajectory, plus the semiauto edge. The major advantages being bullet construction in favor of the .458, and velocity/energy in favor of the .450. I haven't made up my mind yet, but I'm leaning towards the .450 because I'm fairly confident in the "pistol bullets" out there, and would prefer the flatter shooting round, but I'd love to hear some first hand exposure for how the .450 is on big game (by Ridge's pics, I'd say the .458 is doing just fine).
Nomercy448 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 AM.