logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2011, 08:34 AM   #1
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 444
Default Are we going back to shorter barrels in magnums?

I recently had Hill Country Rifles start working on a custom built 7mm. Rem. Mag. for me, and I was a little suprised to find that the majority of their custom rifles are built with a 24" barrel....standard AND magnum.

I guess from a SHOOTERS perspective, something like a 26" barrel would be better simply for getting max velocity when running through a chrono.

I can also see from a HUNTERS perspective, that a 24" barrel gives "adequate" velocity and offers better rifle balance and easier handling in cramped spaces.

I currently have them splitting the difference with a 25" barrel.....but I'm REALLY thinking about going to a 24".

Any opinions would be GREATLY appreciated.
schoolcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 09:45 AM   #2
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 255
Default

I have 2 26" barreled guns. Drives me crazy in my safe. They have to sit in the back by the shotguns or leaning in the front.

Second, I know its just a pain when i hunt newfoundland or places where there is a lot of brush.

Lastly, yea, it the "in thing" to have a short barreled gun. Tactical guys are all going to it. Surprisingly.
BCRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 12:22 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
jeepkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 3,889
Default

I personally can't tell the difference hunting with a 24" 25" or 26" rifle...
__________________
I love Christmas lights. They remind me of the people who voted for Obama. They all hang together; half of them don't work, and the ones that do, aren't that bright.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do
not understand, no explanation is possible.

A golf course is a willful and deliberate misuse of a perfectly good rifle range.



jeepkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 12:48 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 4,580
Default

depends on the purpose of the gun, for a normal rifle 22-24" is fine but for my long range rigs I want long pipes, just for the velocity advantage and they are easier to shoot off a bipod.
RR
__________________
Born To Hunt, Forced To Work.
Ridge Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 01:01 PM   #5
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,706
Default

I'm not sure we're going back to 24" just more hunters like the idea of 24" over 26", I think both will remain available to hunters in the future. The guy who wants every last fps will want the 26" the guy who wants a handier lighter rifle and willing to give up 100fps or less will take a 24"

I'm sure we all wish we could shoot a 300 RUM in a 6 lbs rifle and have 1/2moa accuracy, and have it kick like a .243, for $400, but nothing is free with rifles, have to give up something to get something.

I think by the time you figure out everything about rifles you die an old man, and your wisdom will probably be lost on youth.
salukipv1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 02:39 PM   #6
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 444
Default

Well, I made the call......24" fluted barrel it is.

I noticed that Remington has gone to a 24" barrel on their new 700 XCR II, and I guess Ruger has used 24" on their magnums pretty much forever.
schoolcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 04:17 PM   #7
Nontypical Buck
 
jeepkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 3,889
Default

You won't tell any difference with just 1"...shoulda stuck with the longer tube...
__________________
I love Christmas lights. They remind me of the people who voted for Obama. They all hang together; half of them don't work, and the ones that do, aren't that bright.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do
not understand, no explanation is possible.

A golf course is a willful and deliberate misuse of a perfectly good rifle range.



jeepkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 06:04 PM   #8
Typical Buck
 
fritz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schoolcraft View Post
Well, I made the call......24" fluted barrel it is.

I noticed that Remington has gone to a 24" barrel on their new 700 XCR II, and I guess Ruger has used 24" on their magnums pretty much forever.
My Remington 700 BDL 338 win mag has a 24" barrel but my 300 ultra mags have a 26" barrel.
fritz1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 05:56 AM   #9
Fork Horn
 
warbirdlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: southeastern Wisconsin
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
My Remington 700 BDL 338 win mag has a 24" barrel but my 300 ultra mags have a 26" barrel.
Is that because the 300 RUM has such a large case and so much powder to burn?
__________________
WBL
warbirdlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 06:57 AM   #10
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 444
Default

If I was having a RUM bult, that barrel would be AT LEAST 26".....maybe 27' or 28".....but if I built a .300 Ultra, it wouldn't be for lugging around thick woods.

I know I'm going to like my rifle when it gets finished, but if I had it to do all over again, I probably would have built a .280 Rem. with a 24" barrel and an EDGE McMillan stock to shave off another 8oz. off the weight.

It looks like the total weight of the 7mm. Rem. Mag. Hill Country Rifles is building me will hover around 7 1/4 pounds un-scoped...maybe a tad under. I'm also not going to be shooting excessively long ranges. A recent trip to a 300 yard rifle range shooting at 6" steel plates from "hunting positions" was a VERY humbling experience....practice, practice, practice...lol.

I figure my 7 mag will be much handier carrying through the woods and manuvering in a box stand....and a 160gr. Nosler Accubond should still cause real issues for whatever it's aimed at even if it only came out of a 24" barrel.
schoolcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 PM.