logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-24-2010, 11:16 AM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
Jeff Ovington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,781
Default .270 WSM vs .270 Weatherby

Ok, first off want to say to everyone hope you all have a Merry Christmas.Enjoy it cause we only got 2 more before the World ends.LOL Anyways this is more of a 2 part question. I was at my parents the other night and my cousinis interested in a new factory rifle in a .270 mag version.I don't know anything about these calibers cause I don't own anything in the .270 category.He does own the.270 Win but desires a rifle that can offer some better performance without causing him to flinch..He wants to know which cal. maybe better suited for the brand of rifle he chooses.He wants to go into the store find rifle that fits him, and is in his budget,and is dependable, in
either of these 2 calibers and purchase it.The first thing I told him was if he wants to shoot to shoot a heavier grain bullet (cause he is gonna use it for long range deer in the Alpine and both elk and moose later in the year) he will want a fast twist rate barrel. I notice in the Barnes reloading manual that a 1-9.5 twist is recomended for a 150 gr. Is there a production rifle made that has this twist rate or is
1-10 the fastest one can get. And is a 1-10 be used on a 140 gr bullet.Next one caliber is belted the other is not, does one have an
advantage over the other when the are feeding cartriges in either a
push feed or controlled round feed action.I have heared rumers that
the WSM sometimes can get jammed in a controlled round feed action but I am not sure. Any facts on this comment weather it be true or
false would be appreciated on this.I have heared the .270 WSM is a
very accurate caliber and lots of makes and models offer this and for
the most part hunters seem like it. I don't know about the Weatherby
though. I heard lots of good things about this caliber in the Vanguard but the MarkV not so much. Many are left disapointed with the Mark V but I know other manufactures make this cal. and seem to be extremly happy with accuracy.I personally think he won't choose the Weatherby make anyway cause of the weight issue, but he is a Bull when it comes to packing and hiking he's got the same condition I do abnormally high levels of hemoglobin.But other than price what are other charactoristics between these 2 calibers that would help to pursude him toward one caliber so he can decide what make and models to try out.Thanks guys.
__________________
DONATE BLOOD TODAY.....PLAY HOCKEY
Jeff Ovington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2010, 08:24 PM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,387
Default

I still hunt with my old 270-Winchester for deer & antelope every year. I was almost sold on the 270-WSM when it first hit the market. I just did not see the gain in preformance to justify the cost.
Tell him to look at the 270-Weatherby before he commits to the 270-WSM.
Anything the 270-WSM can do the 270-Weatherby can do better.
Wolf killer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2010, 08:33 PM   #3
Typical Buck
 
fritz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 660
Default

I would go with the Weatherby, it has been arround for a long time, cant say the short mag will, I think its popularity is starting to fizzle. As far as the Mark V and the Vangaurd, the Mark V is a far superior rifle, and its made in America, wereas the Vangaurd is made by Howa in ***an. BUY AMERICAN!!!!!!!
fritz1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2010, 08:46 PM   #4
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,706
Default

there are only 2- 270's I would consider, the .270win and the .270wsm

If I wanted a 270wby, I'd get a .257wby, or a 7mm wby, or a .300wby
salukipv1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2010, 09:28 PM   #5
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orygun
Posts: 316
Default

does he want more performance or is he buying thhe new caliber hype.
__________________
to the brave and faithful man nothing is impossible
jdhogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2010, 06:59 AM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Jeff Ovington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdhogg View Post
does he want more performance or is he buying thhe new caliber hype.
First off just want to say min .270 caliber. We have alot of Blacks and Grizzly bears that may have to be dealt with. We are in pairs at all times one shooter one spotter.When gutting and packing, groups of 4 to 6 with two fully armed.I mean there us alot. We see at least 1 sometimes as many as 5 under 1000yrds at a day over that distance 10 -15. But we are not going below .270 cal. Not saying it's the best cal for bears but a .270 in a mag will help out in this situation more so than a 6.5 x284 6.5 Gibbs or 257 Weatherby.
But to get back on topic,I think he wants a little of both.I didn't call him on it though. He wants a little flatter shooting and harder hitiing and a little less bullet movement from wind. at a little longer distance. We hunt alot of Alpine and in alot of placed it's like a bald Chineese Mans head. Absolutly no cover just moss and lichen very
little grass or trees. Shots can be quite long and without a rangefinder
quite deseaving to hunters.300 yrds is the norm before you start
second guessing yourself about trying to get closer, and the outside is 550 yrds.I know the .270 Win can do it for deer and sheep throughout alot of these distances depending on cirmstance but yeah
I think he feels undergunned when it comes to longer shots, undergunned when it comes to have to deal with bears, and very bored of the .270Win.
__________________
DONATE BLOOD TODAY.....PLAY HOCKEY
Jeff Ovington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2010, 08:00 AM   #7
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 4,580
Default

I own a 270 and a 270 Bee, and a few others, IMO, if more horsepower is required for longer distance shooting IMO I'd go with a 284 diameter due to a better selection of quality bullets with a higher BC. anything a 270 wsm or a Bee can do the 7mm RM with a 160 accubond will do better.RR
__________________
Born To Hunt, Forced To Work.
Ridge Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2010, 09:44 AM   #8
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 743
Default

Did he consider the 7mm rem mag.?Shoots flat like the .270 and hits like the .06
jerry d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2010, 01:00 PM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southeast Missouri
Posts: 1,546
Default

I noticed You stated your Friend wanted a better performing Rifle that wouldn't make him flinch?If You go with any Magnum or WSM Rifle it is going to have a little more felt-recoil.Any ways...I have a Browning bolt-action .270 WSM and it is a much faster bullet that will reach out further than a standard .270 Rifle,it will have more recoil with it being a WSM Rifle and unless You reload your own brass the shells will cost around $30.00 to $40.00 per box of 20 shells.I'm shooting Winchester 150 grain soft-point bullets,You could get other grain bullets that would be lighter but I wanted a heavier bullet for Deer Hunting?I know some guys that have been using 130 grain Ballistic-tip bullets on Whitetails but those could damage meat if they were to hit solid bone...personally I would only use a Ballistic-tip bullet on Predators or Varmints!
GTOHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2010, 06:36 PM   #10
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,605
Default

The 270WSM or WBY isn't going to do a dang thing that the regular ole 270 cant already do.

As factory loaded in equal length barrels with 130 trophy bonded tipped bullets you are only going to gain about 5.5" in trajectory and 1.8" less wind drift at 500 yards.

If he wants a .270 magnum then I certainly won't try to talk him out of it but if he thinks that one of the .270 magnums is going to give him some kind of magical advantage in the field then he is dreaming.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
bigbulls is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 AM.