More T/C Pro HUnter ????'s

dig4gold · 12-24-2009, 07:19 AM

My main interest in the Pro Hunter vs. the standard Encore is the "Flex-Tech" stock.
It is my understanding that the PH stock is designed with Simms and is what they call the "Flex-Tech". T/C's claim is an estimated reduction in recoil of 43%.
So any of you PH shooters agree with this claim? Or is it butkiss and not much different than the standard Encore composite stock?
re: http://www.tcarms.com/technology/index.php

botechboy · 12-25-2009, 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig4gold

My main interest in the Pro Hunter vs. the standard Encore is the "Flex-Tech" stock.
It is my understanding that the PH stock is designed with Simms and is what they call the "Flex-Tech". T/C's claim is an estimated reduction in recoil of 43%.
So any of you PH shooters agree with this claim? Or is it butkiss and not much different than the standard Encore composite stock?
re: http://www.tcarms.com/technology/index.php

I have a pro hunter you can put any thing off a pro hunter on a reg. encore order a reg encore with the flex stock no differ.

dig4gold · 12-25-2009, 05:19 PM

My question was if the Flex tech stock noticably reduces recoil as they claim.

Doesn't matter . . . I've ordered a Pro Hunter in 7mm Rem Mag.
Will let you know. My buddy has a 7mm Ruger with walnut stock. We'll compare.

ajstrider · 12-26-2009, 05:04 AM

I have a normal T/C Encore in .308 but it has the Pro Hunter buttstock on it. I can tell a very large difference in recoil between my other .308's and this one. I actually have a Ruger 77 in .260, it is a full size gun and not really light at all, and the T/C .308 seems to recoil even less than the .260. I shoot 168 loads out of the T/C right now and 130 grain loads out of the .260. I think the pro hunter buttstock is excellent at reducing recoil.