logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2009, 09:00 PM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
bigtim6656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,693
Default Recoil of the ar.

I am going to get a Ar in .308 for my Ky hunt. One big reason is my shoulder is all but trashed. Guess 475 pounds on Ice and concrete did it in last year.
How much differnce is there with the recoil of the ar in 308 then a normal bolt gun in the same cal.? I am assuming it is less as it is semi auto?
Also does a bipod reduce any of the recoil
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
If you want peace, prepare for war.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure." - Thomas Jefferson
Team 17: Kickers and Stickers
bigtim6656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 05:24 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 1,420
Default

Going to a semi-auto will not do a ton to reduce recoil. However, most ARs are equipped with muzzle brakes and that WILL reduce recoil. A 223 in an AR really has zero recoil, in a 308 it will have some but really light. Problem is, you will need to wear earplugs while you hunt or you will lose your hearing. Shooting a muzzle brake with bare ears is NOT something you can tolerate and is not wise. This is one major reason I would never consider a braked rifle for normal hunting.

Rather than going to an AR to reduce recoil, I think you would be better off to either get a 7mm-08 or 243 in a bolt action. 7mm-08 with lighter range bullets is PLENTY for deer and will have very light recoil, 243 has VERY light recoil with any deer load.

If you really want an AR to hunt with, I would get an upper with either of the above cartridges and no brake.
spaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 05:34 AM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
Howler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elizabeth Colo. USA
Posts: 4,371
Default

Quote:
Shooting a muzzle brake with bare ears is NOT something you can tolerate and is not wise. This is one major reason I would never consider a braked rifle for normal hunting.
Fact of the matter is that ANY rifle being fired without hearing protection is going to damage your hearing. Some worse than others, but they all damage your hearing when you don't wear hearing protection.
__________________
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.

Thomas Jefferson
Howler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 05:36 AM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 1,420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howler View Post
Fact of the matter is that ANY rifle being fired without hearing protection is going to damage your hearing. Some worse than others, but they all damage your hearing when you don't wear hearing protection.
You are correct, I wear protection with a .22 when I'm target shooting. But if you've ever been behind both a bolt gun and a brake-equipped rifle, you would understand my point. Most people don't try to get plugs in when hunting with a normal rifle, 1-3 shots/yr without protection won't do much to you. A single shot from an AR will have your ears ringing for ten minutes.
spaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:18 AM.