HD Ruger No. 1 Accurizer

muddywater · 06-04-2003, 02:47 PM

Has anyone used the Accurizer block for the Ruger No. 1, or heard anything about them? I' m wondering if it would make a difference on my rifle.
Thanks

doubleA · 06-04-2003, 08:32 PM

This #1 in 416 Rigby is stock and shoots quite well. I have heard of some accuracy tricks you can do with the hanger also but have had good accuracy with out any work on my #1' s

AA let' s see if this works.....

muddywater · 06-04-2003, 10:13 PM

Thats a hell of a group. I' d hate to half to shoot that monster off of a binch. I was just wondering about the accurizing block. If my No. 1 in 7mm does' t do well which after some fine tuning of my handloads, I think it will, I may like to add the HD block.

oldelkhunter · 06-05-2003, 06:48 AM

This is a tough subject...people either say you don' t need them or swear they work great. I had a 1b in 280 and it didn' t need it nor did my 1s 45/70 both shot well that I didn' t want to muck with anything . My complaint with the 1b was the trigger pull, the 1s came from Ruger with a sweet 3 1/2 lb trigger.

oldelkhunter · 06-05-2003, 06:49 AM

Double A that is one fine shooting rifle hold onto that one.

Judson · 06-08-2003, 03:45 PM

You can subtract bullet diameter from that group if you like, after all .600" for the needle blower shooters does not seem that special. When you subtract bore diameter for a center to center measurement now we got somthing. Excelent group, hows the shoulder? Ever try the Kiplinger single set trigger for the #1? I really like them, unset around 3 pounds, set about 6 oz.