logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-10-2009, 06:22 AM   #1
Spike
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 88
Default Coyote gun - Camo? Yes or No

I posted this in the small game/predator forum but haven't got much of a response. Thought I would see what the gun guys had to say or thought about this.

I wanted to purchase a .223 rifle last year for coyote hunting but it didn't happen. I am looking again and wanted to ask you experienced yote hunters if you thought a camo gun was an advantage or worth the extra money? Since I don't know how much I will get into yote hunting I am not going to spend a lot of money on a gun. I am actually considering the Stevens Model 200 in .223. This is available in a grey synthetic or camo stock. I am leaning toward the grey synthetic based on cost but thought I would ask you guys about the camo option. I know that for turkey hunting a camo gun is nice. I wasn't sure what a coyote see's (if they are color blind)?

Thanks Guys
Absolute Giant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 08:20 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WY
Posts: 1,099
Default

IMHO - Camo isn't worth the extra cost. I've hunted coyotes with wood-stocked, blued rifles for almost 35 years. More important to have the right clothing (especially in the cold) and sit still.
homers brother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 10:16 AM   #3
Giant Nontypical
 
North Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 8,529
Default

Camo on the gun is not necessary. If you are going for better concealment, use camo tape and strips of mesh to break up the outline of the gun and yourself. But even that is probably not necessary. I have had plenty of success hunting without having a camo gun or camo clothing.
__________________
You may beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride!
North Texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 10:22 AM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Big Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scottsbluff, NE
Posts: 1,387
Default

Camo isn't necessary. And with the stevens, it won't serve as additional weather protection as it's only on the stock.
Big Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 07:40 AM   #5
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Snydersville PA
Posts: 101
Send a message via AIM to unklechuckles19
Default

I just sent a stock out to Dynamic Finishes to get coated in camo, cost was $65 plus shipping. I'd get the synthetic stock based on the price difference, and in the future if you'd like to have a camo stock instead, you can either purchase a camo stock, or send it out and get coated. I haven't received my stock back yet, so I cannot comment on the quality yet, but from what I've read its very good.
unklechuckles19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 07:57 AM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
halfbakedi420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,361
Send a message via Yahoo to halfbakedi420
Default

camo doesnt matter, animals have been being killed for a long time with guns befor camo paint on a gun came out. i do prefer the camo on the metal parts cause its wipe and go, and ya dont have ta worry bout it rustin. either way is good.

i guess what im sayin is i gotta bar shortrac in moassy oak breakup and i luv , what i do hate is havin to go and spray all the other guns down so the bluin dont turn orange or red.
__________________
_ _ _Death Comes Out the End of This Thing _ _ _



ĦÅĹFBĂĶĔЙ
halfbakedi420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 05:31 PM   #7
Spike
 
Dan71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Norfolk or Blue Ridge VA
Posts: 20
Default

I use a Winchester Mod 70 Coyote in 243. It has a stainless barrel and a wood stock. I dont think it really makes a difference and like the above post stated its not worth the extra bucks.

Im already in cover when Im hunting Yotes.
Dan71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 02:55 AM   #8
Nontypical Buck
 
elgallo114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S.J., Ca
Posts: 1,048
Default

I bought two rolls of camo form. One in digital desert, the other in digital woodland. With these two colors, I can camo my gun for most any environment I shoot in. And I wrap it a little loose to kinda "blur" up the outline.

I have absolutely no idea if that actually made any difference when hunting. But it makes me feel a little better knowing I don't have to wonder if I should have.
__________________
While you rest, someone, somewhere, is training. When you meet, you will lose.

Ar son an teaghlagh, Le Dia.
elgallo114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 04:15 AM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,624
Default

camo patterns are for catching hunters, not killing animals.
zrexpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 12:02 PM   #10
Typical Buck
 
marlin30/30_drabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: central square, new york
Posts: 552
Default

on sunny days the blueing will kill you with the shine
__________________
mossberg 500
glenfield mod. 75 .22
remington 870 wingmaster
marlin30/30_drabe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 PM.