logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-20-2003, 10:32 PM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
mrfishy34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: warwick ND USA
Posts: 1,081
Default why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

i just can figure it out. i know some poeple that have purchased a .17 caliber rifle and i dono why not a 223. a 223 is bigger. better varmit rifle, longer range, and its cheaper ammunition. i mean i am not sayin that a .17 caliber is bad i like the gun i got to shoot one and they are neat. but why not a 223 instead. its just a plain old better deal i think.
__________________
Shoot Em, Eat Em, Mount Em

Built Ford Tough, future farmer of america
mrfishy34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 01:22 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oakland OR USA
Posts: 2,928
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

Something different .
halcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 04:29 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 262
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

I know three guys who have bought 17 remingtons in the last couple of years, and from talking to them, the main reason seems to be accuracy. All three of these guns will shoot half minute groups right out of the box. I' m not talking about " my rifle that once upon a time shot three out of five into half inch" , they will average better than a half inch at 100. Another thing is less chance of ricochet. Other than that, its like halcon said, no matter what cartridge you choose, someone can say another does the same thing better. The guys I know have all parked their 22 centerfires and are happily burning 17 ammo as fast as they can load it now.
LARRY338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 06:58 AM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bossier City LA United States
Posts: 2,428
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

I know some guys that claim the 17s do less pelt damage. Don' t know if that is true or not. Personally I use a 243 for varmints.
frizzellr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 10:00 AM   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,086
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

I' ve always understood the 17 to have less pelt damage.
wimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 12:41 PM   #6
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fayetteville Arkansas USA
Posts: 319
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

I want one mainly to hunt smaller varmints at longer rang and with less chance for a ricochet.

Oh, not in comparison with a .223 but more so with the regular .22lr I already have.
__________________
" Lord, make me fast and accurate."
BigEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 01:46 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: southeastern, ohio USA
Posts: 21
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

I know nothing about this cal. gun....but a friend of mine at work has one and can' t fined shells for it anywhere......anyone know where he can get some shells for the .17 cal......thanks
__________________
THE OLDER I GET... THE OLDER... OLD IS.....
scrooge1563 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 09:08 PM   #8
Nontypical Buck
 
mrfishy34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: warwick ND USA
Posts: 1,081
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

whats a ricochet. dono what it is.
__________________
Shoot Em, Eat Em, Mount Em

Built Ford Tough, future farmer of america
mrfishy34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 10:14 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: God\'s Country,AR USA
Posts: 106
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

From what I know a ricochet is when your bullet bounces off of something adn changes direction.
__________________
NRA Life Member since 1991
ARBowHntr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2003, 11:59 PM   #10
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tahlequah, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,580
Send a message via Yahoo to TREEDOG
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?

I have a friend in Indiana who shoots one and another in Georgia, both say the pelt damage is minimal. I see the .17 Rem ammo here for sale often and i belive cabela' s has a bulk package of .17 Rem for sale in there new spring shooting catalog, u know the one that comes with the .50 cal ammo cans.
TREEDOG is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.222 Caliber GR8WHITEHUNTR Whitetail Deer Hunting 21 11-21-2010 06:14 AM
What caliber? solocam79 Small Game, Predator and Trapping 43 06-01-2008 07:59 AM
58. Caliber Sharp Shooter Black Powder 26 12-18-2005 05:17 PM
which caliber? jrob_bfd Guns 10 12-08-2005 12:20 PM
best caliber for me deer hunter 21 Guns 19 10-10-2003 04:05 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:03 AM.