logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2008, 08:55 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
Default 223 or 243

I know you guys get these a lot so it shouldn't be any problem getting and answer.. I have a 223 Savage right now but want to get a 700 Remington but I don't know what caliber. The reason I was going to change to a 243 is to justify spending 700$ on a rifle that chances are I'm only going to shoot woodchucks and coyotes out to about 350 yards, then I can always take it up deer hunting if I wanted. But I'm stuck I hae all the reloading stuff for my 223 and grown quite fond of its performance.. What do you all think..
trapper_25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 10:34 PM   #2
Fork Horn
 
kpatte26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 187
Default RE: 223 or 243

I highly suggest sticking with the .223 due to the ballistic performance along with already having the reloading supplies. The range instructor at Meadville Police Department told me that the .223 has the same point of impact at 34 meters and 300 meters so once you sight the .223 in at 34 meters dead on anything out to 300 meters is just a hold on and shoot.
__________________
Never forget that someone is always watching you! So hunt with the highest ethical standards! That will make it harder for the anti-hunting agenda to make a case against us!
kpatte26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 11:59 PM   #3
 
wyotimberghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WYO
Posts: 2,302
Default RE: 223 or 243

Buying a new set of .243 dies won't cost that much. If you've already got a .223 and want a gun that can handle deer as well as varmints, the .243 is the only logical choice IMO.
__________________
`"¢.¸¸."¢Â´><((((º>`"¢.¸¸."¢Â´Â¯ `"¢.¸."¢Â´Â¯`"¢...¸><((((º>
Read The Patriot It's Right -- It's Free
http://PatriotPost.US/subscribe/
wyotimberghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 08:01 AM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
RugerM77.270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast Alabama
Posts: 1,632
Default RE: 223 or 243

Go ahead and get the .243 you'll be glad you did. It will give you a larger variety in your varmint hunting. I have two rifles for deer hunting and am looking at a third just to spice things up sometimes. You can never have to many rifles.
__________________
WAR EAGLE - AU
RugerM77.270 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 03:37 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,295
Send a message via Yahoo to Paul L Mohr
Default RE: 223 or 243

If you wouldn't have thrown deer in there I would have said stick with what you have or bump up to a 22-250. But once you bring large game into the equation then the .243 is the perfect round in my opinion.

I did the exact same thing as you. I live in lower Michigan where you can't deer hunt with a centerfire. I mainly wanted a high powered rifle to do some woodchuck hunting with, maybe a coyote or two. However there is always the off chance I will go up north and hunt someday and centerfires are legal there. So rather than getting a 22-250 I went with the .243 instead.

Paul
__________________
I didn't climb to the top of the food chain to eat carrots! (Ron White)
Paul L Mohr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 03:45 PM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,706
Default RE: 223 or 243

I've never been a fan of the .223.....so IMO get a .243

To me if the .223 weren't a military round, it would be cease to exist. Both the .22-250 and .220 swift are way WAY better.

And the .243 has more of a varmint/deer combo where as the other is pretty strickly varmints. Seriously, if you gave me a .223.....I'd sell it. If you gave me a .22-250, .220, .243, I'd certainly keep it/use it.




salukipv1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 08:44 PM   #7
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 422
Default RE: 223 or 243

Good news! You have a Savage. You can convert it to a .243 with nothing more than a barrel ($120), barrel nut wrench ($20), bolthead ($30) and a couple of headspace gauges ($30). After you invest in the tools, you can then use the same tools and switch it to 7mm-08 or .308 for just the cost of a barrel. Tkaes less than 30 minutes to do the swap.
kelbro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 10:08 PM   #8
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 10,257
Default RE: 223 or 243

Quote:
ORIGINAL: salukipv1

To me if the .223 weren't a military round, it would be cease to exist. Both the .22-250 and .220 swift are way WAY better.

A bit better as far as muzzle velocity and ballistics, but, they use more powder, make more noise, have a bit more recoil, are more expensive to shoot, are harder on barrels, aren't available in an "EBR".... Kind of like saying "if the .308 and .30-06 weren't military rounds, they would cease to exist. Both the .300 Win Mag and .300 RUM are way WAY better..."
ipscshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 01:41 AM   #9
Boone & Crockett
 
Aught Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 13,219
Default RE: 223 or 243

Quote:
A bit better as far as muzzle velocity and ballistics, but, they use more powder, make more noise, have a bit more recoil, are more expensive to shoot, are harder on barrels, aren't available in an "EBR".... Kind of like saying "if the .308 and .30-06 weren't military rounds, they would cease to exist. Both the .300 Win Mag and .300 RUM are way WAY better..."
LOL, excellent analogy...

As for the original post, yes, get the .243 and go hunt somedeer with it. You'll have a blast.
__________________
Matthew 18:3-6
Aught Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 03:28 AM   #10
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rivesville, WV
Posts: 3,194
Default RE: 223 or 243

I am not sure if I am reading your post right, but it sounds to me like you are wanting to upgrade the quality of the rifle you have. So I am asuming you are going to get rid of the Savage. In that case I would buy another 223. If you are wanting to buy an additional rifle and keep your Savage then I would skip the 243 and get a more substantial cartridge.The 223 is adequate for what you want to do, but you are pretty much at the limit at 350 yards for ground hog's and coyote's. You might try the larger bulets-if you already have not done so.

I am not a fan of the 223 for deer.Some people like the 243 for deer, but I do not particularly care for it. Buy a good quality 223 now, and if you do some deer hunting down the road you can upgrade to a better cartridge and have two rifles. Tom.
__________________
West by God Virginia.
We need to stop using these terms today, "Sniper Rifle", "Tactical", "Assault Weapon".
HEAD0001 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:32 AM.