logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2008, 03:41 PM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,706
Default Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Looking for a scope for my .243win. considering.... setup for antelope....

Main question is does anyone like nikon rifle scopes, particularly their Monarch series? not Monarch Gold series. I notice its certainly priced lower than the vx-III's.

Leupold vx-iii 3.5-10x40 B&C reticle $560
4.5-14x40 AO(adj.obj.) B&C reticle $610
4.5-14x40 LR(30mm tube) B&C reticle $680

Nikon Monarch 3-12x42 SF(side focus) BDC reticle $430


The price isn't a deciding factor, but quality certainly is. I like the 3-12x range, not sure I like the BDC circles rather than crosshairs. Already have a vx-iii with the B&C and I like it, but I do like 3-12 better than I like 4.5-14, or 3.5-10 I'm thinking.

Any help?....
salukipv1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 06:40 PM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Warren County NJ USA
Posts: 3,045
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Nikon is good, between the two you mentioned, I would go with the Leupold hands down. I have Leupold VX-II 3-9x40 on most of my rifles, muzzleloaders and slug shotguns, and a VX-III on my .300 win mag
__________________
Mathews Z7, Quad Ultra Pro Rest, HHA OL-5500 Sight,
Carbon Express Maxima 250 Arrows, Muzzy 3 Blade 100gr. Broadheads,
T/C Triumph, Leupold VX-II 3-9X40,
Savage 220f 20ga., Leupold VX-II 3-9X40, Remington Accu-Tips
Mossberg 835 Turkey Shotgun
BOWHUNTERCOP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 07:00 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
VAhuntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 2,807
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

I don't have any experience with the new Monarchs or the VX-III's, other than in the showroom where they all look great, but I do have a 2006 Nikon Monarch(3-9x40) and a Leupold VX-II(3-9x40). The Nikon is noticeably brighter and clearer to my eyes butseems to have a more narrow eye box. If I were buying a 3-9x power scope now I would pick up a Zeiss Conquest over the VX-III and save myself some money to boot.
__________________
"Never stand and take a charge...charge them too."

--- General Nathan Bedford Forrest, CSA
VAhuntr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 09:06 PM   #4
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: va USA
Posts: 580
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

I prefer the Nikon's myself. I think quality wise Nikon matches up very well with Leupold and is always a little less expensive. IMO similar quality, less money equals better value.
__________________
If you can't shoot enough gun then go home!
popeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 09:09 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,470
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Quote:
I prefer the Nikon's myself. I think quality wise Nikon matches up very well with Leupold and is always a little less expensive. IMO similar quality, less money equals better value.

Pretty much have the same feeling about those 2. BTW there is an optics forum
__________________
"Banning guns is an idea whose time has come."

- Joseph Biden

Associated Press 11/18/93



"Be thankful that we're not getting all the government we are paying for." Will Rogers
oldelkhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 12:36 AM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,882
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Posted my reply in the optic forum thread[8D]
skeeter 7MM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 05:49 AM   #7
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MISSOURI
Posts: 1,158
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

I like them both but to answer your question.If you ask me to to pick I would take the nikon!
DANTHEHUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 07:22 AM   #8
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 17
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Have heard all good about Monarch. I am looking at a Votex 3.5 - 10 x 40 or 50. Have not used Vortex scope but have two pair of binos and spotting scope. All feedback is excellent. They have an excellent warranty also and excellent dollar value

M30
dirtythirtym30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 10:57 AM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Edcyclopedia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. NH
Posts: 3,004
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

4.5-14x40 LR(30mm tube) B&C reticle $680
__________________
IF we all ARCHERY hunted with our QUIVERS loaded with Slim Jim's, WOULD the WORLD be a SAFER PLACE???
Edcyclopedia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 11:47 AM   #10
Nontypical Buck
 
whitetaildreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Mb, Canada
Posts: 1,308
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

I'd go with the Nikon but that is only personal preference and not to say anything bad about the Leupold. For the prices you have quoted I would also check out the Zeiss Conquest for it is also in that price range and an excellent scope.
whitetaildreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon Monarch, Buckmaster and Leupold vx3 robbcayman Optics 17 08-29-2008 01:14 AM
Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ? salukipv1 Optics 8 05-21-2008 02:30 AM
Which Nikon Monarch??? Kirch Optics 11 10-29-2007 07:32 AM
Nikon Buckmaster and Nikon Monarch 800 Range Finders losthwy Bowhunting 3 07-22-2007 03:24 PM
Nikon Monarch or Leupold VX-II? BOWHUNTERCOP Firearm Review Forum 13 12-25-2004 02:47 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 AM.