logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-29-2008, 11:12 AM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,882
Default Talley's LW's???

Tell me what you think of Talley LW's Alloy (ring and base mounts)?

What about for use on a338wm?

Talley'swebsitestates low fit upto 44m objectives but wondering if anybody has evertried the lows witha 44mm Conquest?BTW rifle is a Browning abolt (no boss).

Thanks
skeeter 7MM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 11:44 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Ky
Posts: 2,647
Send a message via Yahoo to stalkingbear
Default RE: Talley's LW's???

To begin with,altho I usually shy away from aluminum rings,talley is top of the line products. I assume you're talking about the 1 piece ring/base and I really like idea of that as it eliminates parts/screws to potentionally come loose.
__________________
Sometimes you earthlings REALLY amaze me!
stalkingbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 04:16 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,470
Default RE: Talley's LW's???

Made of 7075 alloy tensile strength of 75000psi and designed by Melvin Forbes for use on ultralight rifles what is not to like about them. If they can take the recoil of a 284-shortmag cartridge that weighs 5 lbs and maybe 6 with a scope it can sure take a 338 win mag. I can mount the low mounts either Lightweight or Steel ring and put a Swarovski 4-12x50 AV on it with no clearance problems. That would be on a VAnguard but since they have the same bolt spacing as a Remington 700 will work as well. Their lows are about Leupold medium. I have lightweight's that I used deer hunting on a 25-06 Abolt and used a Kahles 3-9x42 with no clearance issues. Not sure if the Zeiss has a much bigger frontbucket then the Kahles or Swaro though.
__________________
"Banning guns is an idea whose time has come."

- Joseph Biden

Associated Press 11/18/93



"Be thankful that we're not getting all the government we are paying for." Will Rogers
oldelkhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 09:10 PM   #4
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,882
Default RE: Talley's LW's???

YesI was referring to the ring and base talley combo. I too have always been a Steel mounts are best guy. However I like the theory behind these and so far everything i have heard has been positive. Just wanted to know if anybody has used them for larger then .300's.

Quote:
ORIGINAL: oldelkhunter

Not sure if the Zeiss has a much bigger frontbucket then the Kahles or Swaro though.
Zeiss measures:
Objective (OD): 49mm
Eyepiece (OD): 44mm

The specs I could find were on a 1" 3x9x42 Kahles where the objective (OD) is 48mm and the eye piece (OD)is 43mm.

OEH,do you have OD measurements??? Is their room to putBCflip upson?If i canmake the switch therifle will bestrictly amoose and elk gun,moisture in the way of rain and wet snow is likely, so I'll want ButlerCreekson it.


Thanks
skeeter 7MM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 09:41 PM   #5
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,605
Default RE: Talley's LW's???

Skeeter I haven't used them on my personal riflesbutI haveinstalled a bunch on encores in the past. The encore set up is one single piece for the front and rear. We never had a problem with any of them. Typical Talley quality.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
bigbulls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 09:06 AM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,223
Default RE: Talley's LW's???

I've had them on a Kimber 84M in .308 for two years now. Scope is a Swaro American 3-9 X 36. No issues what-so-ever.
__________________
If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.
bugsNbows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 11:00 AM   #7
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,470
Default RE: Talley's LW's???

Quote:
OEH,do you have OD measurements??? Is their room to putBCflip upson?If i canmake the switch therifle will bestrictly amoose and elk gun,moisture in the way of rain and wet snow is likely, so I'll want ButlerCreekson it.
With a 4-12x50 AV on a Vanguard there was very little room for the front covers that Swaro supplies, I had to shave the bottoms with an exacto knive , it was close. With a 44 I would think you would have plenty of room.

I think the Factory supplied flipups are thicker then a Butler Creek.
__________________
"Banning guns is an idea whose time has come."

- Joseph Biden

Associated Press 11/18/93



"Be thankful that we're not getting all the government we are paying for." Will Rogers
oldelkhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 AM.